lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3823be537c3c138de90154835573113c6577188e.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Date:   Mon, 22 Feb 2021 17:30:59 +0100
From:   Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To:     Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>, mkl@...gutronix.de,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
        Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>,
        Robin van der Gracht <robin@...tonic.nl>
Cc:     kernel@...gutronix.de, linux-can@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v1 3/3] [RFC] mac80211: ieee80211_store_ack_skb():
 make use of skb_clone_sk_optional()

On Mon, 2021-02-22 at 16:12 +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> This code is trying to clone the skb with optional skb->sk. But this
> will fail to clone the skb if socket was closed just after the skb was
> pushed into the networking stack.

Which IMHO is completely fine. If we then still clone the SKB we can't
do anything with it, since the point would be to ... send it back to the
socket, but it's gone.

Nothing to fix here, I'd think. If you wanted to get a copy back that
gives you the status of the SKB, it should not come as a huge surprise
that you have to keep the socket open for that :)

Having the ACK skb will just make us do more work by handing it back
to skb_complete_wifi_ack() at TX status time, which is supposed to put
it into the socket's error queue, but if the socket is closed ... no
point in that.

johannes


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ