[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YDPdWtwO/uPHf69Q@google.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Feb 2021 16:35:38 +0000
From: Quentin Perret <qperret@...gle.com>
To: Vincent Donnefort <vincent.donnefort@....com>
Cc: peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
dietmar.eggemann@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
patrick.bellasi@...bug.net, valentin.schneider@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: Fix task utilization accountability in
cpu_util_next()
On Monday 22 Feb 2021 at 16:31:08 (+0000), Vincent Donnefort wrote:
> I suppose, a way of fixing this, is to keep cpu_util_next() the way it is to
> get the appropriate frequency at which the CPU would run once the task has been
> enqueued, for the 'max_util', and have 'sum_util' being the sum of the pd's util
> (without the task) + task_util_est().
You read my mind :)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists