linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] Kasan improvements and fixes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 22 Feb 2021 18:58:22 -0800 (PST)
From:   Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>
To:     alex@...ti.fr
CC:     aryabinin@...tuozzo.com, glider@...gle.com, dvyukov@...gle.com,
        Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
        aou@...s.berkeley.edu, kasan-dev@...glegroups.com,
        linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject:     Re: [PATCH 0/4] Kasan improvements and fixes

On Sun, 21 Feb 2021 05:42:08 PST (-0800), alex@...ti.fr wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Le 2/8/21 à 2:30 PM, Alexandre Ghiti a écrit :
>> This small series contains some improvements for the riscv KASAN code:
>>
>> - it brings a better readability of the code (patch 1/2)
>> - it fixes oversight regarding page table population which I uncovered
>>    while working on my sv48 patchset (patch 3)
>> - it helps to have better performance by using hugepages when possible
>>    (patch 4)
>>
>> Alexandre Ghiti (4):
>>    riscv: Improve kasan definitions
>>    riscv: Use KASAN_SHADOW_INIT define for kasan memory initialization
>>    riscv: Improve kasan population function
>>    riscv: Improve kasan population by using hugepages when possible
>>
>>   arch/riscv/include/asm/kasan.h |  22 +++++-
>>   arch/riscv/mm/kasan_init.c     | 119 ++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>>   2 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
>>
>
> I'm cc-ing linux-arch and linux-mm to get more chance to have reviewers
> on this series.

Sorry about that, I must have missed these.  For some reason I remember having
read the big one, so I'm not sure what happened.  They're on for-next.

Thanks!