[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87k0qztxi6.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 11:53:53 +1100
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>
To: Oliver O'Halloran <oohall@...il.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@...abs.ru>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ux.ibm.com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.ibm.com>,
Athira Jajeev <atrajeev@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Qian Cai <cai@....pw>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
Cédric Le Goater <clg@...d.org>,
cmr@...efail.de, cy.fan@...wei.com, eerykitty@...il.com,
Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@...ux.ibm.com>,
ganeshgr@...ux.ibm.com, Haren Myneni <haren@...ux.ibm.com>,
Hari Bathini <hbathini@...ux.ibm.com>,
jiapeng.chong@...ux.alibaba.com,
Pingfan Liu <kernelfans@...il.com>, kjain@...ux.ibm.com,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
Michal Suchanek <msuchanek@...e.de>,
Nathan Lynch <nathanl@...ux.ibm.com>,
Nick Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Po-Hsu Lin <po-hsu.lin@...onical.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>, sandipan@...ux.ibm.com,
skirmisher@...tonmail.com,
Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@...il.com>,
Zheng Yongjun <zhengyongjun3@...wei.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] Please pull powerpc/linux.git powerpc-5.12-1 tag
"Oliver O'Halloran" <oohall@...il.com> writes:
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 9:44 AM Linus Torvalds
> <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 4:06 AM Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au> wrote:
>> >
>> > Please pull powerpc updates for 5.12.
>>
>> Pulled. However:
>>
>> > mode change 100755 => 100644 tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/eeh/eeh-functions.sh
>> > create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/eeh/eeh-vf-aware.sh
>> > create mode 100755 tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/eeh/eeh-vf-unaware.sh
>>
>> Somebody is being confused.
>>
>> Why create two new shell scripts with the proper executable bit, and
>> then remove the executable bit from an existing one?
>>
>> That just seems very inconsistent.
>
> eeh-function.sh just provides some helper functions for the other
> scripts and doesn't do anything when executed directly. I thought
> making it non-executable made sense.
Yeah I think it does make sense. It just looks a bit odd in the diffstat
like this. Maybe if we called it lib.sh it would be more obvious?
cheers
Powered by blists - more mailing lists