linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86/entry: Fix entry/exit mismatch on failed fast 32-bit syscalls

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87sg5n5bfr.fsf@nanos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date:   Tue, 23 Feb 2021 11:24:24 +0100
From:   Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To:     Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, x86@...nel.org
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86/entry: Fix entry/exit mismatch on failed fast 32-bit syscalls

On Mon, Feb 22 2021 at 21:50, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On a 32-bit fast syscall that fails to read its arguments from user
> memory, the kernel currently does syscall exit work but not
> syscall exit work.

and this sentence does not make any sense.

> This would confuse audit and ptrace.

Would? It does confuse it, right?

> This is a minimal fix intended for ease of backporting.  A more
> complete cleanup is coming.
>
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Fixes: 0b085e68f407 ("x86/entry: Consolidate 32/64 bit syscall entry")
> Signed-off-by: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
> ---
>  arch/x86/entry/common.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/common.c b/arch/x86/entry/common.c
> index 0904f5676e4d..cf4dcf346ca8 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/entry/common.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/entry/common.c
> @@ -128,7 +128,8 @@ static noinstr bool __do_fast_syscall_32(struct pt_regs *regs)
>  		regs->ax = -EFAULT;
>  
>  		instrumentation_end();
> -		syscall_exit_to_user_mode(regs);
> +		local_irq_disable();
> +		exit_to_user_mode();

While I suggested this with tired brain yesterday night, it's not really
correct as it does not go through exit_to_user_mode_prepare() which it
really has to.

Thanks,

        tglx