[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210223104957.GA3844@linux>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 11:50:05 +0100
From: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>
To: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, mingo@...hat.com,
bp@...en8.de, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, luto@...nel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, paulmck@...nel.org,
mchehab+huawei@...nel.org, pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>, oneukum@...e.com,
anshuman.khandual@....com, jroedel@...e.de,
Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
"Song Bao Hua (Barry Song)" <song.bao.hua@...ilicon.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
<naoya.horiguchi@....com>,
Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@...cle.com>,
Xiongchun duan <duanxiongchun@...edance.com>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [External] Re: [PATCH v16 4/9] mm: hugetlb: alloc the vmemmap
pages associated with each HugeTLB page
On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 06:27:07PM +0800, Muchun Song wrote:
> > > > +
> > > > + if (alloc_huge_page_vmemmap(h, page)) {
> > > > + int zeroed;
> > > > +
> > > > + spin_lock(&hugetlb_lock);
> > > > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&page->lru);
> > > > + set_compound_page_dtor(page, HUGETLB_PAGE_DTOR);
> > > > + h->nr_huge_pages++;
> > > > + h->nr_huge_pages_node[nid]++;
> >
> > I think prep_new_huge_page() does this for us?
>
> Actually, there are some differences. e.g. prep_new_huge_page()
> will reset hugetlb cgroup and ClearHPageFreed, but we do not need
> them here. And prep_new_huge_page will acquire and release
> the hugetlb_lock. But here we also need hold the lock to update
> the surplus counter and enqueue the page to the free list.
> So I do not think reuse prep_new_huge_page is a good idea.
I see, I missed that.
> > Can this actually happen? AFAIK, page landed in update_and_free_page should be
> > zero refcounted, then we increase the reference, and I cannot see how the
> > reference might have changed in the meantime.
>
> I am not sure whether other modules get the page and then put the
> page. I see gather_surplus_pages does the same thing. So I copied
> from there. I try to look at the memory_failure routine.
>
>
> CPU0: CPU1:
> set_compound_page_dtor(HUGETLB_PAGE_DTOR);
> memory_failure_hugetlb
> get_hwpoison_page
> __get_hwpoison_page
> get_page_unless_zero
> put_page_testzero()
>
> Maybe this can happen. But it is a very corner case. If we want to
> deal with this. We can put_page_testzero() first and then
> set_compound_page_dtor(HUGETLB_PAGE_DTOR).
I have to check further, but it looks like this could actually happen.
Handling this with VM_BUG_ON is wrong, because memory_failure/soft_offline are
entitled to increase the refcount of the page.
AFAICS,
CPU0: CPU1:
set_compound_page_dtor(HUGETLB_PAGE_DTOR);
memory_failure_hugetlb
get_hwpoison_page
__get_hwpoison_page
get_page_unless_zero
put_page_testzero()
identify_page_state
me_huge_page
I think we can reach me_huge_page with either refcount = 1 or refcount =2,
depending whether put_page_testzero has been issued.
For now, I would not re-enqueue the page if put_page_testzero == false.
I have to see how this can be handled gracefully.
--
Oscar Salvador
SUSE L3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists