lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 23 Feb 2021 14:00:38 +0100
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     "Zhengyejian (Zetta)" <zhengyejian1@...wei.com>
Cc:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, judy.chenhui@...wei.com,
        zhangjinhao2@...wei.com, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.9.257 1/1] futex: Fix OWNER_DEAD fixup

On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 09:11:43PM +0800, Zhengyejian (Zetta) wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2021/2/22 20:36, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 08:20:38PM +0800, Zhengyejian (Zetta) wrote:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On 2021/2/22 20:07, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 11:54:24AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, 22 Feb 2021, Zheng Yejian wrote:
> > > > > 
> > > > > > From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > commit a97cb0e7b3f4c6297fd857055ae8e895f402f501 upstream.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Both Geert and DaveJ reported that the recent futex commit:
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >     c1e2f0eaf015 ("futex: Avoid violating the 10th rule of futex")
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > introduced a problem with setting OWNER_DEAD. We set the bit on an
> > > > > > uninitialized variable and then entirely optimize it away as a
> > > > > > dead-store.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Move the setting of the bit to where it is more useful.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
> > > > > > Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@...emonkey.org.uk>
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
> > > > > > Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> > > > > > Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
> > > > > > Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ibm.com>
> > > > > > Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> > > > > > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
> > > > > > Fixes: c1e2f0eaf015 ("futex: Avoid violating the 10th rule of futex")
> > > > > > Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180122103947.GD2228@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Zheng Yejian <zhengyejian1@...wei.com>
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > >    kernel/futex.c | 7 +++----
> > > > > >    1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> > > > > 
> > > > > Reviewed-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
> > > > 
> > > > This does not apply to the 4.9.y tree at all right now, are you all sure
> > > > you got the backport correct?
> > > > 
> > > > confused,
> > > > 
> > > > greg k-h
> > > > .
> > > > 
> > > I make the patch basing on 282aeb477a10 ("Linux 4.9.257").
> > > Should I base on f0cf73f13b39 ("Linux 4.9.258-rc1")?
> > 
> > Yes please as I think this is already there.
> > 
> > How about just waiting for the next release to come out, I will push out
> > the 4.4 and 4.9 -rc releases right now as well to give everyone a chance
> > to sync up properly.
> Ok, I will rebase this patch then.

Great, can you try 4.9.258?

thanks,

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ