[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210223134202.qepkmphp34onaesw@steredhat>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 14:42:02 +0100
From: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
To: Arseny Krasnov <arseny.krasnov@...persky.com>
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Jorgen Hansen <jhansen@...are.com>,
Andra Paraschiv <andraprs@...zon.com>,
Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>,
Norbert Slusarek <nslusarek@....net>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stsp2@...dex.ru, oxffffaa@...il.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v5 09/19] virtio/vsock: set packet's type in send
The title is a little cryptic, maybe a something like:
virtio/vsock: set packet's type in virtio_transport_send_pkt_info()
On Thu, Feb 18, 2021 at 08:39:02AM +0300, Arseny Krasnov wrote:
>This moves passing type of packet from 'info' srtucture to send
Also here replace send with the function name.
>function. There is no sense to set type of packet which differs
>from type of socket, and since at current time only stream type
>is supported, so force to use this type.
I'm not a native speaker, but I would rephrase a bit the commit message:
There is no need to set type of packet which differs from type of
socket. Since at current time only stream type is supported, set
it directly in virtio_transport_send_pkt_info(), so callers don't
need to set it.
>
>Signed-off-by: Arseny Krasnov <arseny.krasnov@...persky.com>
>---
> net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 7 ++-----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
If I haven't missed something, we can remove 'type' parameter also from
virtio_transport_send_credit_update(), right?
>diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
>index e4370b1b7494..1c9d71ca5e8e 100644
>--- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
>+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
>@@ -179,6 +179,8 @@ static int virtio_transport_send_pkt_info(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
> struct virtio_vsock_pkt *pkt;
> u32 pkt_len = info->pkt_len;
>
>+ info->type = VIRTIO_VSOCK_TYPE_STREAM;
>+
> t_ops = virtio_transport_get_ops(vsk);
> if (unlikely(!t_ops))
> return -EFAULT;
>@@ -624,7 +626,6 @@ int virtio_transport_connect(struct vsock_sock *vsk)
> {
> struct virtio_vsock_pkt_info info = {
> .op = VIRTIO_VSOCK_OP_REQUEST,
>- .type = VIRTIO_VSOCK_TYPE_STREAM,
> .vsk = vsk,
> };
>
>@@ -636,7 +637,6 @@ int virtio_transport_shutdown(struct vsock_sock *vsk, int mode)
> {
> struct virtio_vsock_pkt_info info = {
> .op = VIRTIO_VSOCK_OP_SHUTDOWN,
>- .type = VIRTIO_VSOCK_TYPE_STREAM,
> .flags = (mode & RCV_SHUTDOWN ?
> VIRTIO_VSOCK_SHUTDOWN_RCV : 0) |
> (mode & SEND_SHUTDOWN ?
>@@ -665,7 +665,6 @@ virtio_transport_stream_enqueue(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
> {
> struct virtio_vsock_pkt_info info = {
> .op = VIRTIO_VSOCK_OP_RW,
>- .type = VIRTIO_VSOCK_TYPE_STREAM,
> .msg = msg,
> .pkt_len = len,
> .vsk = vsk,
>@@ -688,7 +687,6 @@ static int virtio_transport_reset(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
> {
> struct virtio_vsock_pkt_info info = {
> .op = VIRTIO_VSOCK_OP_RST,
>- .type = VIRTIO_VSOCK_TYPE_STREAM,
> .reply = !!pkt,
> .vsk = vsk,
> };
>@@ -990,7 +988,6 @@ virtio_transport_send_response(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
> {
> struct virtio_vsock_pkt_info info = {
> .op = VIRTIO_VSOCK_OP_RESPONSE,
>- .type = VIRTIO_VSOCK_TYPE_STREAM,
> .remote_cid = le64_to_cpu(pkt->hdr.src_cid),
> .remote_port = le32_to_cpu(pkt->hdr.src_port),
> .reply = true,
>--
>2.25.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists