linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC 4/4] perf/core: Add breakpoint information to siginfo on SIGTRAP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 23 Feb 2021 16:01:32 +0100
From:   Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
To:     Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
Cc:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Christian Brauner <christian@...uner.io>,
        Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        Matt Morehouse <mascasa@...gle.com>,
        Peter Collingbourne <pcc@...gle.com>,
        Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
        kasan-dev <kasan-dev@...glegroups.com>,
        linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org,
        "the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 4/4] perf/core: Add breakpoint information to siginfo
 on SIGTRAP

On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 3:34 PM Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> Encode information from breakpoint attributes into siginfo_t, which
> helps disambiguate which breakpoint fired.
>
> Note, providing the event fd may be unreliable, since the event may have
> been modified (via PERF_EVENT_IOC_MODIFY_ATTRIBUTES) between the event
> triggering and the signal being delivered to user space.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
> ---
>  kernel/events/core.c | 11 +++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
> index 8718763045fd..d7908322d796 100644
> --- a/kernel/events/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/events/core.c
> @@ -6296,6 +6296,17 @@ static void perf_sigtrap(struct perf_event *event)
>         info.si_signo = SIGTRAP;
>         info.si_code = TRAP_PERF;
>         info.si_errno = event->attr.type;
> +
> +       switch (event->attr.type) {
> +       case PERF_TYPE_BREAKPOINT:
> +               info.si_addr = (void *)(unsigned long)event->attr.bp_addr;
> +               info.si_perf = (event->attr.bp_len << 16) | (u64)event->attr.bp_type;
> +               break;
> +       default:
> +               /* No additional info set. */

Should we prohibit using attr.sigtrap for !PERF_TYPE_BREAKPOINT if we
don't know what info to pass yet?

> +               break;
> +       }
> +
>         force_sig_info(&info);
>  }
>
> --
> 2.30.0.617.g56c4b15f3c-goog
>