[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BL0PR04MB651408C561B5E4B6889F6841E7809@BL0PR04MB6514.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2021 02:31:43 +0000
From: Damien Le Moal <Damien.LeMoal@....com>
To: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
"linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>
CC: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@...gle.com>,
"pczarnecki@...ernships.antmicro.com"
<pczarnecki@...ernships.antmicro.com>,
"leonard.crestez@....com" <leonard.crestez@....com>,
"peng.fan@....com" <peng.fan@....com>,
"joel@....id.au" <joel@....id.au>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kernel-team@...roid.com" <kernel-team@...roid.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc: canaan: Sort the Makefile alphabetically
On 2021/02/23 11:19, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> From: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@...gle.com>
>
> The rest of these are alphabetically sorted, and leaving it this way
> causes a merge conflict.
>
> Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@...gle.com>
>
> ---
>
> I missed this when reviewing these patches, but happened across it when
> test merging from Linus' tree. It goes back a way so I'm hesitant to
> rebase this one out just for cleanliness, but if I have to go back that
> far before sending the merge window PR I'll squash it in.
> ---
> drivers/soc/Makefile | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/Makefile b/drivers/soc/Makefile
> index fa7071246546..34b23645be14 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/soc/Makefile
> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ACTIONS) += actions/
> obj-y += aspeed/
> obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_AT91) += atmel/
> obj-y += bcm/
> +obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_CANAAN) += canaan/
> obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_DOVE) += dove/
> obj-$(CONFIG_MACH_DOVE) += dove/
> obj-y += fsl/
> @@ -29,4 +30,3 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_U8500) += ux500/
> obj-$(CONFIG_PLAT_VERSATILE) += versatile/
> obj-y += xilinx/
> obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_ZX) += zte/
> -obj-$(CONFIG_SOC_CANAAN) += canaan/
>
Yes. Should have sent that... Thanks.
Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@....com>
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
Powered by blists - more mailing lists