[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aea7945a0a481046b3ab73950e71b11a39ad7a81.camel@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 13:31:31 -0500
From: Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Ville Syrjälä
<ville.syrjala@...ux.intel.com>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@...el.com>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/30] drm/dp: Rewrap kdocs for struct drm_dp_aux
On Fri, 2021-02-19 at 15:42 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 2/19/21 1:52 PM, Lyude Paul wrote:
> > Since we're about to be adding some more fields and update this
> > documentation, let's rewrap it to the new column limit of 100 beforehand.
> > No actual doc or functional changes are made here.
> >
>
> The preferred column limit is still 80.
> For some (exceptional) cases, going up to 100 is OK,
> but I don't see any reason here to go beyond 80.
Found some posts online that discussed this in detail:
https://linux.slashdot.org/story/20/05/31/211211/linus-torvalds-argues-against-80-column-line-length-coding-style-as-linux-kernel-deprecates-it
so I guess I'm fine with rewrapping these to 80 cols (although honestly, it'd be
really nice to just have a single col limit to make things easier on text
editors :) in the next respin.
> Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul <lyude@...hat.com>
> ---
> include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h | 42 ++++++++++++++++---------------------
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h b/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h
> index edffd1dcca3e..2891a98eebc8 100644
> --- a/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h
> +++ b/include/drm/drm_dp_helper.h
> @@ -1839,34 +1839,28 @@ struct drm_dp_aux_cec {
> * @crc_count: counter of captured frame CRCs
> * @transfer: transfers a message representing a single AUX transaction
> *
> - * The .dev field should be set to a pointer to the device that implements
> - * the AUX channel.
> + * The .dev field should be set to a pointer to the device that implements
> the AUX channel.
> *
> - * The .name field may be used to specify the name of the I2C adapter. If set
> to
> - * NULL, dev_name() of .dev will be used.
> + * The .name field may be used to specify the name of the I2C adapter. If set
> to NULL, dev_name() of
> + * .dev will be used.
> *
> - * Drivers provide a hardware-specific implementation of how transactions
> - * are executed via the .transfer() function. A pointer to a drm_dp_aux_msg
> - * structure describing the transaction is passed into this function. Upon
> - * success, the implementation should return the number of payload bytes
> - * that were transferred, or a negative error-code on failure. Helpers
> - * propagate errors from the .transfer() function, with the exception of
> - * the -EBUSY error, which causes a transaction to be retried. On a short,
> - * helpers will return -EPROTO to make it simpler to check for failure.
> + * Drivers provide a hardware-specific implementation of how transactions are
> executed via the
> + * .transfer() function. A pointer to a drm_dp_aux_msg structure describing
> the transaction is
> + * passed into this function. Upon success, the implementation should return
> the number of payload
> + * bytes that were transferred, or a negative error-code on failure. Helpers
> propagate errors from
> + * the .transfer() function, with the exception of the -EBUSY error, which
> causes a transaction to
> + * be retried. On a short, helpers will return -EPROTO to make it simpler to
> check for failure.
> *
> - * An AUX channel can also be used to transport I2C messages to a sink. A
> - * typical application of that is to access an EDID that's present in the
> - * sink device. The .transfer() function can also be used to execute such
> - * transactions. The drm_dp_aux_register() function registers an I2C
> - * adapter that can be passed to drm_probe_ddc(). Upon removal, drivers
> - * should call drm_dp_aux_unregister() to remove the I2C adapter.
> - * The I2C adapter uses long transfers by default; if a partial response is
> - * received, the adapter will drop down to the size given by the partial
> - * response for this transaction only.
> + * An AUX channel can also be used to transport I2C messages to a sink. A
> typical application of
> + * that is to access an EDID that's present in the sink device. The
> .transfer() function can also be
> + * used to execute such transactions. The drm_dp_aux_register() function
> registers an I2C adapter
> + * that can be passed to drm_probe_ddc(). Upon removal, drivers should call
> drm_dp_aux_unregister()
> + * to remove the I2C adapter. The I2C adapter uses long transfers by default;
> if a partial response
> + * is received, the adapter will drop down to the size given by the partial
> response for this
> + * transaction only.
> *
> - * Note that the aux helper code assumes that the .transfer() function
> - * only modifies the reply field of the drm_dp_aux_msg structure. The
> - * retry logic and i2c helpers assume this is the case.
> + * Note that the aux helper code assumes that the .transfer() function only
> modifies the reply field
> + * of the drm_dp_aux_msg structure. The retry logic and i2c helpers assume
> this is the case.
> */
> struct drm_dp_aux {
> const char *name;
>
--
Sincerely,
Lyude Paul (she/her)
Software Engineer at Red Hat
Note: I deal with a lot of emails and have a lot of bugs on my plate. If you've
asked me a question, are waiting for a review/merge on a patch, etc. and I
haven't responded in a while, please feel free to send me another email to check
on my status. I don't bite!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists