linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/2] background initramfs unpacking, and CONFIG_MODPROBE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <e240d10c-2c81-d3f2-9973-5527297db8de@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
Date:   Wed, 24 Feb 2021 23:19:03 +0100
From:   Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC 0/2] background initramfs unpacking, and
 CONFIG_MODPROBE_PATH

On 24/02/2021 15.29, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> These two patches are independent, but better-together.

kernel test robot says I'll have to add a 0/2 patch:

linux/initrd.h: grow an include guard

[because defining a macro a second time with the same contents is ok, so
is doing another extern declaration, but a trivial static inline
definition can't be repeated sigh]