linux-kernel - Re: [External] Re: [PATCH v16 4/9] mm: hugetlb: alloc the vmemmap pages associated with each HugeTLB page

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 24 Feb 2021 11:47:49 +0800
From:   Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
To:     Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>
Cc:     Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, mingo@...hat.com,
        bp@...en8.de, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
        dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, luto@...nel.org,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, paulmck@...nel.org,
        mchehab+huawei@...nel.org, pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>, oneukum@...e.com,
        anshuman.khandual@....com, jroedel@...e.de,
        Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>,
        David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
        "Song Bao Hua (Barry Song)" <song.bao.hua@...ilicon.com>,
        David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
        HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也) 
        <naoya.horiguchi@....com>,
        Joao Martins <joao.m.martins@...cle.com>,
        Xiongchun duan <duanxiongchun@...edance.com>,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [External] Re: [PATCH v16 4/9] mm: hugetlb: alloc the vmemmap
 pages associated with each HugeTLB page

On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 6:32 AM Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 04:41:28PM +0100, Oscar Salvador wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 11:50:05AM +0100, Oscar Salvador wrote:
> > > > CPU0:                           CPU1:
> > > >                                 set_compound_page_dtor(HUGETLB_PAGE_DTOR);
> > > > memory_failure_hugetlb
> > > >   get_hwpoison_page
> > > >     __get_hwpoison_page
> > > >       get_page_unless_zero
> > > >                                 put_page_testzero()
> > > >
> > > > Maybe this can happen. But it is a very corner case. If we want to
> > > > deal with this. We can put_page_testzero() first and then
> > > > set_compound_page_dtor(HUGETLB_PAGE_DTOR).
> > >
> > > I have to check further, but it looks like this could actually happen.
> > > Handling this with VM_BUG_ON is wrong, because memory_failure/soft_offline are
> > > entitled to increase the refcount of the page.
> > >
> > > AFAICS,
> > >
> > >  CPU0:                                    CPU1:
> > >                                           set_compound_page_dtor(HUGETLB_PAGE_DTOR);
> > >  memory_failure_hugetlb
> > >    get_hwpoison_page
> > >      __get_hwpoison_page
> > >        get_page_unless_zero
> > >                                           put_page_testzero()
> > >         identify_page_state
> > >          me_huge_page
> > >
> > > I think we can reach me_huge_page with either refcount = 1 or refcount =2,
> > > depending whether put_page_testzero has been issued.
> > >
> > > For now, I would not re-enqueue the page if put_page_testzero == false.
> > > I have to see how this can be handled gracefully.
> >
> > I took a brief look.
> > It is not really your patch fault. Hugetlb <-> memory-failure synchronization is
> > a bit odd, it definitely needs improvment.
> >
> > The thing is, we can have different scenarios here.
> > E.g: by the time we return from put_page_testzero, we might have refcount ==
> > 0 and PageHWPoison, or refcount == 1 PageHWPoison.
> >
> > The former will let a user get a page from the pool and get a sigbus
> > when it faults in the page, and the latter will be even more odd as we
> > will have a self-refcounted page in the free pool (and hwpoisoned).

I have been looking at the dequeue_huge_page_node_exact().
If a PageHWPoison huge page is in the free pool list, the page will
not be allocated to the user. The PageHWPoison huge page
will be skip in the dequeue_huge_page_node_exact().

> >
> > As I said, it is not this patchset fault. I just made me realize this
> > problem.
> >
> > I have to think some more about this.
>
> I have been thinking more about this.
> memory failure events can occur at any time, and we might not be in a
> position where we can handle gracefully the error, meaning that the page
> might end up in non desirable state.
>
> E.g: we could flag the page right before enqueing it.
>
> I still think that VM_BUG_ON should go, as the refcount can be perfectly
> increased by memory-failure/soft_offline handlers, so BUGing there does
> not make much sense.

Make sense. I will remove the VM_BUG_ON.

>
> One think we could do is to check the state of the page we want to
> retrieve from the free hugepage pool.
> We should discard any HWpoisoned ones, and dissolve them.
>
> The thing is, memory-failure/soft_offline should allocate a new hugepage
> for the free pool, so keep the pool stable.
> Something like [1].
>
> Anyway, this is orthogonal to this patch, and something I will work on
> soon.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20210222135137.25717-2-osalvador@suse.de/T/#u

Thanks for your efforts on this.

>
> --
> Oscar Salvador
> SUSE L3