[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DM6PR04MB6575BBF6F89002222EA5FC1DFC9F9@DM6PR04MB6575.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 09:52:43 +0000
From: Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@....com>
To: "daejun7.park@...sung.com" <daejun7.park@...sung.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"jejb@...ux.ibm.com" <jejb@...ux.ibm.com>,
"martin.petersen@...cle.com" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
"asutoshd@...eaurora.org" <asutoshd@...eaurora.org>,
"stanley.chu@...iatek.com" <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>,
"cang@...eaurora.org" <cang@...eaurora.org>,
"bvanassche@....org" <bvanassche@....org>,
"huobean@...il.com" <huobean@...il.com>,
ALIM AKHTAR <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>
CC: "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
JinHwan Park <jh.i.park@...sung.com>,
Javier Gonzalez <javier.gonz@...sung.com>,
SEUNGUK SHIN <seunguk.shin@...sung.com>,
Sung-Jun Park <sungjun07.park@...sung.com>,
yongmyung lee <ymhungry.lee@...sung.com>,
Jinyoung CHOI <j-young.choi@...sung.com>,
BoRam Shin <boram.shin@...sung.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v24 4/4] scsi: ufs: Add HPB 2.0 support
> if (dev_info->wspecversion >= UFS_DEV_HPB_SUPPORT_VERSION &&
> (b_ufs_feature_sup & UFS_DEV_HPB_SUPPORT)) {
> - dev_info->hpb_enabled = true;
> + bool hpb_en = false;
> +
> ufshpb_get_dev_info(hba, desc_buf);
> +
> + err = ufshcd_query_flag_retry(hba,
> UPIU_QUERY_OPCODE_READ_FLAG,
> + QUERY_FLAG_IDN_HPB_EN, 0, &hpb_en);
> + if (ufshpb_is_legacy(hba) || (!err && hpb_en))
If is_legacy you shouldn't send fHPBen in the first place, not ignoring its failure.
Also, using a Boolean is limiting you to HPB2.0 vs. HPB1.0.
What would you do in new flags/attributes/descriptors that HPB3.0 will introduce?
> + dev_info->hpb_enabled = true;
> }
Powered by blists - more mailing lists