lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 09:11:47 +0800 From: Shuo A Liu <shuo.a.liu@...el.com> To: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@....com> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>, Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>, "Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de> Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v2 2/2] virt: acrn: Make remove_cpu sysfs invisible with !CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU Hi, On Tue 23.Feb'21 at 15:25:30 +0000, Qais Yousef wrote: >On 02/21/21 21:43, shuo.a.liu@...el.com wrote: >> From: Shuo Liu <shuo.a.liu@...el.com> >> >> Without cpu hotplug support, vCPU cannot be removed from a Service VM. >> Don't expose remove_cpu sysfs when CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU disabled. >> >> Signed-off-by: Shuo Liu <shuo.a.liu@...el.com> >> Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org> # build-tested >> Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> >> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> >> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> >> Cc: Qais Yousef <qais.yousef@....com> >> --- >> drivers/virt/acrn/hsm.c | 9 +++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/virt/acrn/hsm.c b/drivers/virt/acrn/hsm.c >> index 1f6b7c54a1a4..6996ea6219e5 100644 >> --- a/drivers/virt/acrn/hsm.c >> +++ b/drivers/virt/acrn/hsm.c >> @@ -404,6 +404,14 @@ static ssize_t remove_cpu_store(struct device *dev, >> } >> static DEVICE_ATTR_WO(remove_cpu); >> >> +static umode_t acrn_attr_visible(struct kobject *kobj, struct attribute *a, int n) >> +{ >> + if (a == &dev_attr_remove_cpu.attr) >> + return IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU) ? a->mode : 0; >> + >> + return a->mode; >> +} >> + > >I can't find this code in Linus' master. But this looks fine from my narrow Now, the code is still in linux-next tree only. >PoV. Protecting the attribute with ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU is easier to read >for me, but this doesn't mean this approach is not fine. Just FYI, Greg prefers this solution. https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210212045724.77846-1-shuo.a.liu@intel.com/ Thanks shuo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists