[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YDZjOHKmks9ChFQI@rocinante>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 15:31:20 +0100
From: Krzysztof WilczyĆski <kw@...ux.com>
To: Jianjun Wang <jianjun.wang@...iatek.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, maz@...nel.org,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
Ryder Lee <ryder.lee@...iatek.com>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Sj Huang <sj.huang@...iatek.com>, youlin.pei@...iatek.com,
chuanjia.liu@...iatek.com, qizhong.cheng@...iatek.com,
sin_jieyang@...iatek.com, drinkcat@...omium.org,
Rex-BC.Chen@...iatek.com, anson.chuang@...iatek.com
Subject: Re: [v8,5/7] PCI: mediatek-gen3: Add MSI support
Hi Jianjun,
[...]
> +static struct irq_chip mtk_msi_irq_chip = {
> + .name = "MSI",
> + .irq_enable = mtk_pcie_irq_unmask,
> + .irq_disable = mtk_pcie_irq_mask,
> + .irq_ack = irq_chip_ack_parent,
> + .irq_mask = mtk_pcie_irq_mask,
> + .irq_unmask = mtk_pcie_irq_unmask,
> +};
For consistency sake, what about aligning this like the
struct mtk_msi_bottom_irq_chip has been? See immediately below.
[...]
> +static struct irq_chip mtk_msi_bottom_irq_chip = {
> + .irq_ack = mtk_msi_bottom_irq_ack,
> + .irq_mask = mtk_msi_bottom_irq_mask,
> + .irq_unmask = mtk_msi_bottom_irq_unmask,
> + .irq_compose_msi_msg = mtk_compose_msi_msg,
> + .irq_set_affinity = mtk_pcie_set_affinity,
> + .name = "MSI",
> +};
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists