[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <32ac05ef-b50b-c947-095d-bc31a42947a3@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 08:44:45 -0800
From: "Yu, Yu-cheng" <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Balbir Singh <bsingharora@...il.com>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...il.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
Eugene Syromiatnikov <esyr@...hat.com>,
Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>,
"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
"Ravi V. Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
Vedvyas Shanbhogue <vedvyas.shanbhogue@...el.com>,
Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>,
Weijiang Yang <weijiang.yang@...el.com>,
Pengfei Xu <pengfei.xu@...el.com>,
Haitao Huang <haitao.huang@...el.com>,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v21 06/26] x86/cet: Add control-protection fault handler
On 2/24/2021 8:13 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 02:27:10PM -0800, Yu-cheng Yu wrote:
>> +/*
>> + * When a control protection exception occurs, send a signal to the responsible
>> + * application. Currently, control protection is only enabled for user mode.
>> + * This exception should not come from kernel mode.
>> + */
>> +DEFINE_IDTENTRY_ERRORCODE(exc_control_protection)
>> +{
>> + static DEFINE_RATELIMIT_STATE(rs, DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_INTERVAL,
>> + DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_BURST);
[...]
>> +
>> + rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_PL3_SSP, ssp);
>> + pr_emerg("%s[%d] control protection ip:%lx sp:%lx ssp:%lx error:%lx(%s)",
>> + tsk->comm, task_pid_nr(tsk),
>> + regs->ip, regs->sp, ssp, error_code,
>> + control_protection_err[err]);
>> + print_vma_addr(KERN_CONT " in ", regs->ip);
>> + pr_cont("\n");
>> + }
>> +
>> + force_sig_fault(SIGSEGV, SEGV_CPERR,
>> + (void __user *)uprobe_get_trap_addr(regs));
>
> Why is this calling an uprobes function?
>
I will change it to error_get_trap_addr().
> Also, do not break that line even if it is longer than 80.
>
>> + cond_local_irq_disable(regs);
>> +}
>> +#endif
>> +
>> static bool do_int3(struct pt_regs *regs)
>> {
>> int res;
>> diff --git a/include/uapi/asm-generic/siginfo.h b/include/uapi/asm-generic/siginfo.h
>> index d2597000407a..1c2ea91284a0 100644
>> --- a/include/uapi/asm-generic/siginfo.h
>> +++ b/include/uapi/asm-generic/siginfo.h
>> @@ -231,7 +231,8 @@ typedef struct siginfo {
>> #define SEGV_ADIPERR 7 /* Precise MCD exception */
>> #define SEGV_MTEAERR 8 /* Asynchronous ARM MTE error */
>> #define SEGV_MTESERR 9 /* Synchronous ARM MTE exception */
>> -#define NSIGSEGV 9
>> +#define SEGV_CPERR 10 /* Control protection fault */
>> +#define NSIGSEGV 10
>
> I still don't see the patch adding this to the manpage of sigaction(2).
>
> There's a git repo there: https://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/
>
> and I'm pretty sure Michael takes patches.
>
I will send a patch.
--
Yu-cheng
Powered by blists - more mailing lists