[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.11.2102240854140.10197@eggly.anvils>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 08:55:40 -0800 (PST)
From: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
To: Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
xuyu@...ux.alibaba.com, mgorman@...e.de, aarcange@...hat.com,
willy@...radead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...com, linux-mm@...ck.org, mhocko@...e.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/3] mm,thp,shm: limit shmem THP alloc gfp_mask
On Wed, 24 Feb 2021, Rik van Riel wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-02-24 at 00:41 -0800, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > On Mon, 14 Dec 2020, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> >
> > > > (There's also a specific issue with the gfp_mask limiting: I have
> > > > not yet reviewed the allowing and denying in detail, but it looks
> > > > like it does not respect the caller's GFP_ZONEMASK - the gfp in
> > > > shmem_getpage_gfp() and shmem_read_mapping_page_gfp() is there to
> > > > satisfy the gma500, which wanted to use shmem but could only
> > manage
> > > > DMA32. I doubt it wants THPS, but shmem_enabled=force forces
> > them.)
> >
> > Oh, I'd forgotten all about that gma500 aspect:
> > well, I can send a fixup later on.
>
> I already have code to fix that, which somebody earlier
> in this discussion convinced me to throw away. Want me
> to send it as a patch 4/3 ?
If Andrew wants it all, yes, please do add that - thanks Rik.
Hugh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists