| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 12:47:43 -0800
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ben Gardon <bgardon@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH 18/24] KVM: x86/mmu: Make Host-writable and MMU-writable bit
locations dynamic
Make the location of the HOST_WRITABLE and MMU_WRITABLE configurable for
a given KVM instance. This will allow EPT to use high available bits,
which in turn will free up bit 11 for a constant MMU_PRESENT bit.
No functional change intended.
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
---
Documentation/virt/kvm/locking.rst | 18 +++++++++---------
arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h | 12 ++++++------
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c | 8 ++++----
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h | 2 +-
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c | 13 +++++++++----
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h | 13 ++++++-------
arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c | 6 +++---
7 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/virt/kvm/locking.rst b/Documentation/virt/kvm/locking.rst
index 85876afe0441..1fc860c007a3 100644
--- a/Documentation/virt/kvm/locking.rst
+++ b/Documentation/virt/kvm/locking.rst
@@ -44,18 +44,18 @@ following two cases:
2. Write-Protection: The SPTE is present and the fault is caused by
write-protect. That means we just need to change the W bit of the spte.
-What we use to avoid all the race is the SPTE_HOST_WRITEABLE bit and
-SPTE_MMU_WRITEABLE bit on the spte:
+What we use to avoid all the race is the Host-writable bit and MMU-writable bit
+on the spte:
-- SPTE_HOST_WRITEABLE means the gfn is writable on host.
-- SPTE_MMU_WRITEABLE means the gfn is writable on mmu. The bit is set when
- the gfn is writable on guest mmu and it is not write-protected by shadow
- page write-protection.
+- Host-writable means the gfn is writable in the host kernel page tables and in
+ its KVM memslot.
+- MMU-writable means the gfn is writable in the guest's mmu and it is not
+ write-protected by shadow page write-protection.
On fast page fault path, we will use cmpxchg to atomically set the spte W
-bit if spte.SPTE_HOST_WRITEABLE = 1 and spte.SPTE_WRITE_PROTECT = 1, to
-restore the saved R/X bits if for an access-traced spte, or both. This is
-safe because whenever changing these bits can be detected by cmpxchg.
+bit if spte.HOST_WRITEABLE = 1 and spte.WRITE_PROTECT = 1, to restore the saved
+R/X bits if for an access-traced spte, or both. This is safe because whenever
+changing these bits can be detected by cmpxchg.
But we need carefully check these cases:
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h
index 11cf7793cfee..72b0f66073dc 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu.h
@@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ static inline int kvm_mmu_do_page_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t cr2_or_gpa,
* write-protects guest page to sync the guest modification, b) another one is
* used to sync dirty bitmap when we do KVM_GET_DIRTY_LOG. The differences
* between these two sorts are:
- * 1) the first case clears SPTE_MMU_WRITEABLE bit.
+ * 1) the first case clears MMU-writable bit.
* 2) the first case requires flushing tlb immediately avoiding corrupting
* shadow page table between all vcpus so it should be in the protection of
* mmu-lock. And the another case does not need to flush tlb until returning
@@ -136,17 +136,17 @@ static inline int kvm_mmu_do_page_fault(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gpa_t cr2_or_gpa,
* So, there is the problem: the first case can meet the corrupted tlb caused
* by another case which write-protects pages but without flush tlb
* immediately. In order to making the first case be aware this problem we let
- * it flush tlb if we try to write-protect a spte whose SPTE_MMU_WRITEABLE bit
- * is set, it works since another case never touches SPTE_MMU_WRITEABLE bit.
+ * it flush tlb if we try to write-protect a spte whose MMU-writable bit
+ * is set, it works since another case never touches MMU-writable bit.
*
* Anyway, whenever a spte is updated (only permission and status bits are
- * changed) we need to check whether the spte with SPTE_MMU_WRITEABLE becomes
+ * changed) we need to check whether the spte with MMU-writable becomes
* readonly, if that happens, we need to flush tlb. Fortunately,
* mmu_spte_update() has already handled it perfectly.
*
- * The rules to use SPTE_MMU_WRITEABLE and PT_WRITABLE_MASK:
+ * The rules to use MMU-writable and PT_WRITABLE_MASK:
* - if we want to see if it has writable tlb entry or if the spte can be
- * writable on the mmu mapping, check SPTE_MMU_WRITEABLE, this is the most
+ * writable on the mmu mapping, check MMU-writable, this is the most
* case, otherwise
* - if we fix page fault on the spte or do write-protection by dirty logging,
* check PT_WRITABLE_MASK.
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index 1fb500db46e0..e636fcd529d2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -1107,7 +1107,7 @@ static bool spte_write_protect(u64 *sptep, bool pt_protect)
rmap_printk("spte %p %llx\n", sptep, *sptep);
if (pt_protect)
- spte &= ~SPTE_MMU_WRITEABLE;
+ spte &= ~shadow_mmu_writable_mask;
spte = spte & ~PT_WRITABLE_MASK;
return mmu_spte_update(sptep, spte);
@@ -5485,9 +5485,9 @@ void kvm_mmu_slot_remove_write_access(struct kvm *kvm,
* spte from present to present (changing the spte from present
* to nonpresent will flush all the TLBs immediately), in other
* words, the only case we care is mmu_spte_update() where we
- * have checked SPTE_HOST_WRITEABLE | SPTE_MMU_WRITEABLE
- * instead of PT_WRITABLE_MASK, that means it does not depend
- * on PT_WRITABLE_MASK anymore.
+ * have checked Host-writable | MMU-writable instead of
+ * PT_WRITABLE_MASK, that means it does not depend on PT_WRITABLE_MASK
+ * anymore.
*/
if (flush)
kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlbs_memslot(kvm, memslot);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h
index 55d7b473ac44..8b9987d5fe02 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h
@@ -1084,7 +1084,7 @@ static int FNAME(sync_page)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp)
nr_present++;
- host_writable = sp->spt[i] & SPTE_HOST_WRITEABLE;
+ host_writable = sp->spt[i] & shadow_host_writable_mask;
set_spte_ret |= set_spte(vcpu, &sp->spt[i],
pte_access, PG_LEVEL_4K,
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c
index ac5ea6fda969..2329ba60c67a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.c
@@ -21,6 +21,8 @@
static bool __read_mostly enable_mmio_caching = true;
module_param_named(mmio_caching, enable_mmio_caching, bool, 0444);
+u64 __read_mostly shadow_host_writable_mask;
+u64 __read_mostly shadow_mmu_writable_mask;
u64 __read_mostly shadow_nx_mask;
u64 __read_mostly shadow_x_mask; /* mutual exclusive with nx_mask */
u64 __read_mostly shadow_user_mask;
@@ -137,7 +139,7 @@ int make_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int pte_access, int level,
kvm_is_mmio_pfn(pfn));
if (host_writable)
- spte |= SPTE_HOST_WRITEABLE;
+ spte |= shadow_host_writable_mask;
else
pte_access &= ~ACC_WRITE_MASK;
@@ -147,7 +149,7 @@ int make_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int pte_access, int level,
spte |= (u64)pfn << PAGE_SHIFT;
if (pte_access & ACC_WRITE_MASK) {
- spte |= PT_WRITABLE_MASK | SPTE_MMU_WRITEABLE;
+ spte |= PT_WRITABLE_MASK | shadow_mmu_writable_mask;
/*
* Optimization: for pte sync, if spte was writable the hash
@@ -163,7 +165,7 @@ int make_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, unsigned int pte_access, int level,
__func__, gfn);
ret |= SET_SPTE_WRITE_PROTECTED_PT;
pte_access &= ~ACC_WRITE_MASK;
- spte &= ~(PT_WRITABLE_MASK | SPTE_MMU_WRITEABLE);
+ spte &= ~(PT_WRITABLE_MASK | shadow_mmu_writable_mask);
}
}
@@ -202,7 +204,7 @@ u64 kvm_mmu_changed_pte_notifier_make_spte(u64 old_spte, kvm_pfn_t new_pfn)
new_spte |= (u64)new_pfn << PAGE_SHIFT;
new_spte &= ~PT_WRITABLE_MASK;
- new_spte &= ~SPTE_HOST_WRITEABLE;
+ new_spte &= ~shadow_host_writable_mask;
new_spte = mark_spte_for_access_track(new_spte);
@@ -342,6 +344,9 @@ void kvm_mmu_reset_all_pte_masks(void)
shadow_acc_track_mask = 0;
shadow_me_mask = sme_me_mask;
+ shadow_host_writable_mask = DEFAULT_SPTE_HOST_WRITEABLE;
+ shadow_mmu_writable_mask = DEFAULT_SPTE_MMU_WRITEABLE;
+
/*
* Set a reserved PA bit in MMIO SPTEs to generate page faults with
* PFEC.RSVD=1 on MMIO accesses. 64-bit PTEs (PAE, x86-64, and EPT
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h
index e918b8f0b21d..287540d211a9 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/spte.h
@@ -5,8 +5,6 @@
#include "mmu_internal.h"
-#define PT_FIRST_AVAIL_BITS_SHIFT 10
-
/*
* TDP SPTES (more specifically, EPT SPTEs) may not have A/D bits, and may also
* be restricted to using write-protection (for L2 when CPU dirty logging, i.e.
@@ -59,9 +57,8 @@ static_assert(SPTE_TDP_AD_ENABLED_MASK == 0);
(((address) >> PT64_LEVEL_SHIFT(level)) & ((1 << PT64_LEVEL_BITS) - 1))
#define SHADOW_PT_INDEX(addr, level) PT64_INDEX(addr, level)
-
-#define SPTE_HOST_WRITEABLE (1ULL << PT_FIRST_AVAIL_BITS_SHIFT)
-#define SPTE_MMU_WRITEABLE (1ULL << (PT_FIRST_AVAIL_BITS_SHIFT + 1))
+#define DEFAULT_SPTE_HOST_WRITEABLE BIT_ULL(10)
+#define DEFAULT_SPTE_MMU_WRITEABLE BIT_ULL(11)
/*
* Due to limited space in PTEs, the MMIO generation is a 20 bit subset of
@@ -100,6 +97,8 @@ static_assert(MMIO_SPTE_GEN_LOW_BITS == 9 && MMIO_SPTE_GEN_HIGH_BITS == 11);
#define MMIO_SPTE_GEN_MASK GENMASK_ULL(MMIO_SPTE_GEN_LOW_BITS + MMIO_SPTE_GEN_HIGH_BITS - 1, 0)
+extern u64 __read_mostly shadow_host_writable_mask;
+extern u64 __read_mostly shadow_mmu_writable_mask;
extern u64 __read_mostly shadow_nx_mask;
extern u64 __read_mostly shadow_x_mask; /* mutual exclusive with nx_mask */
extern u64 __read_mostly shadow_user_mask;
@@ -264,8 +263,8 @@ static inline bool is_dirty_spte(u64 spte)
static inline bool spte_can_locklessly_be_made_writable(u64 spte)
{
- return (spte & (SPTE_HOST_WRITEABLE | SPTE_MMU_WRITEABLE)) ==
- (SPTE_HOST_WRITEABLE | SPTE_MMU_WRITEABLE);
+ return (spte & shadow_host_writable_mask) &&
+ (spte & shadow_mmu_writable_mask);
}
static inline u64 get_mmio_spte_generation(u64 spte)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
index 782cae1eb5e1..bef0e1908e82 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
@@ -1329,7 +1329,7 @@ void kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_collapsible_sptes(struct kvm *kvm,
/*
* Removes write access on the last level SPTE mapping this GFN and unsets the
- * SPTE_MMU_WRITABLE bit to ensure future writes continue to be intercepted.
+ * MMU-writable bit to ensure future writes continue to be intercepted.
* Returns true if an SPTE was set and a TLB flush is needed.
*/
static bool write_protect_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
@@ -1346,7 +1346,7 @@ static bool write_protect_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
break;
new_spte = iter.old_spte &
- ~(PT_WRITABLE_MASK | SPTE_MMU_WRITEABLE);
+ ~(PT_WRITABLE_MASK | shadow_mmu_writable_mask);
tdp_mmu_set_spte(kvm, &iter, new_spte);
spte_set = true;
@@ -1359,7 +1359,7 @@ static bool write_protect_gfn(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
/*
* Removes write access on the last level SPTE mapping this GFN and unsets the
- * SPTE_MMU_WRITABLE bit to ensure future writes continue to be intercepted.
+ * MMU-writable bit to ensure future writes continue to be intercepted.
* Returns true if an SPTE was set and a TLB flush is needed.
*/
bool kvm_tdp_mmu_write_protect_gfn(struct kvm *kvm,
--
2.30.1.766.gb4fecdf3b7-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists