linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] coresight: etm4x: work around clang-12+ build failure

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 25 Feb 2021 23:04:19 +0100
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
To:     Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
Cc:     Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
        Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
        Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Mike Leach <mike.leach@...aro.org>,
        Leo Yan <leo.yan@...aro.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@...eaurora.org>,
        coresight@...ts.linaro.org,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
        Bill Wendling <morbo@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] coresight: etm4x: work around clang-12+ build failure

On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 10:23 PM 'Nick Desaulniers' via Clang Built
Linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 8:45 AM Mathieu Poirier
> <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org> wrote:
> >
> > Good morning,
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 10:42:58AM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> > >
> > > clang-12 fails to build the etm4x driver with -fsanitize=array-bounds:
>
> Is a sanitizer enabled, that would trap on OOB?
>
> > >
> > > Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1310

As described over there, this happens only with the array-bounds
sanitizer.

Actually, looking at it again now, in the reduced test case, the inline
assembly is not even parsable, it only works because it never gets
emitted without  -fsanitize=array-bounds, and the alternative
code path is used in

#define read_etm4x_sysreg_offset(offset, _64bit)
         \
        ({
         \
                u64 __val;
         \

         \
                if (__builtin_constant_p((offset)))
         \
                        __val =
read_etm4x_sysreg_const_offset((offset));       \
                else
         \
                        __val = etm4x_sysreg_read((offset), true,
(_64bit));    \
                __val;
         \
         })

read_etm4x_sysreg_const_offset() eventually turns into something
like

asm("msr_s " __stringify(offset));

so the offset has to be something that can be parsed by the
assembler. __builtin_constant_p() checks that it is a constant
value at compile-time, and in this case it can be because there
is a small upper bound and clang just unrolls the loop.

I don't think there is an alternative to __builtin_constant_p()
that can be used to decide if the argument is something that
can be used as a constant expression in an inline assembly.

            Arnd