[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210225004430.GA9420@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 16:44:30 -0800
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@...ux.alibaba.com>
Cc: josh@...htriplett.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, jiangshanlai@...il.com,
joel@...lfernandes.org, rcu@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rcu: make nocb_nobypass_lim_per_jiffy static
On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 04:30:29PM +0800, Jiapeng Chong wrote:
> Fix the following sparse warning:
>
> kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h:1497:5: warning: symbol
> 'nocb_nobypass_lim_per_jiffy' was not declared. Should it be static?
>
> Reported-by: Abaci Robot <abaci@...ux.alibaba.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jiapeng Chong <jiapeng.chong@...ux.alibaba.com>
Queued with Frederic's ack (given offlist), thank you both!
Thanx, Paul
> ---
> kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> index 2d60377..8ff8cf8 100644
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
> @@ -1494,7 +1494,7 @@ static int __init parse_rcu_nocb_poll(char *arg)
> * After all, the main point of bypassing is to avoid lock contention
> * on ->nocb_lock, which only can happen at high call_rcu() rates.
> */
> -int nocb_nobypass_lim_per_jiffy = 16 * 1000 / HZ;
> +static int nocb_nobypass_lim_per_jiffy = 16 * 1000 / HZ;
> module_param(nocb_nobypass_lim_per_jiffy, int, 0);
>
> /*
> --
> 1.8.3.1
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists