lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 25 Feb 2021 08:56:55 +0800
From:   yumeng <yumeng18@...wei.com>
To:     <Tudor.Ambarus@...rochip.com>, <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        <davem@...emloft.net>, <marcel@...tmann.org>,
        <johan.hedberg@...il.com>, <luiz.dentz@...il.com>
CC:     <linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org>, <xuzaibo@...wei.com>,
        <wangzhou1@...ilicon.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 3/7] crypto: move curve_id of ECDH from the key to
 algorithm name



在 2021/2/24 18:15, Tudor.Ambarus@...rochip.com 写道:
> On 2/24/21 3:29 AM, yumeng wrote:
>> EXTERNAL EMAIL: Do not click links or open attachments unless you know the content is safe
>>
>> 在 2021/2/23 18:44, Tudor.Ambarus@...rochip.com 写道:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On 2/23/21 9:10 AM, Meng Yu wrote:
>>>> --- a/drivers/crypto/atmel-ecc.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/crypto/atmel-ecc.c
>>>> @@ -104,7 +104,7 @@ static int atmel_ecdh_set_secret(struct crypto_kpp *tfm, const void *buf,
>>>>                   return -EINVAL;
>>>>           }
>>>>
>>>> -       ctx->n_sz = atmel_ecdh_supported_curve(params.curve_id);
>>>> +       ctx->n_sz = atmel_ecdh_supported_curve(ctx->curve_id);
>>>>           if (!ctx->n_sz || params.key_size) {
>>>>                   /* fallback to ecdh software implementation */
>>>>                   ctx->do_fallback = true;
>>>
>>> Now that you moved the curve id info into the alg name, and it is
>>> no longer dynamically discovered when decoding the key, does it
>>> still make sense to keep the curve id, the key size checks, and
>>> the fallback to the software implementation?
>>> I think we can keep the curve id, the key size check if 'atmel-ecc' may
>> support other curves in the future, and if you're sure P256 is the only
>> curve 'atmel-ecc' uses, and it will be changed, we can delete it.
>>
>> And fallback to ecdh software implementation is needed when
>> params.key_size is zero.
>>
> 
> I've read the code again, now I remember. The fallback is needed indeed,
> but for other reason. ecdh-nist-p256 will be handled in the crypto IP
> only when its user provides a zero length private key: we will use a
> pre-provisioned private key that can't be read outside of the device.
> The fallback was needed for ecdh-nist-p256 when the user provides a
> non-zero private key, or for other curve IDs.
> 
> Since the atecc508 and atecc608 (for which there isn't support in kernel
> as of now) both support just NIST Standard P256 Elliptic Curve, and the
> curve id is now unique per alg, the ctx->curve_id handling does no longer
> make sense. So please remove the ctx->curve_id handling. ctx->n_sz can be
> removed too and use instead directly ATMEL_ECC_NIST_P256_N_SIZE, similar
> to how ATMEL_ECC_PUBKEY_SIZE is used.
> 

OK, thanks, I will remove it. But I'd like to wait 2 more days, as maybe 
the owners of other modules (like crypto or bluetooth) have any comments.

thanks.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists