lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YDdcvkQQoAs2yc3C@kroah.com>
Date:   Thu, 25 Feb 2021 09:15:58 +0100
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, olteanv@...il.com, sashal@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH stable 0/8] net: dsa: b53: Correct learning for
 standalone ports

On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 05:08:53PM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> From: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@...adcom.com>
> 
> Hi Greg, Sasha, Jaakub and David,
> 
> This patch series contains backports for a change that recently made it
> upstream as:
> 
> commit f3f9be9c58085d11f4448ec199bf49dc2f9b7fb9
> Merge: 18755e270666 f9b3827ee66c
> Author: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
> Date:   Tue Feb 23 12:23:06 2021 -0800
> 
>     Merge branch 'net-dsa-learning-fixes-for-b53-bcm_sf2'

That is a merge commit, not a "real" commit.

What is the upstream git commit id for this?

> The way this was fixed in the netdev group's net tree is slightly
> different from how it should be backported to stable trees which is why
> you will find a patch for each branch in the thread started by this
> cover letter.
> 
> Let me know if this does not apply for some reason. The changes from 4.9
> through 4.19 are nearly identical and then from 5.4 through 5.11 are
> about the same.

Thanks for the backports, but I still need a real git id to match these
up with :)

greg k-h

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ