linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] sched/fair: use lsub_positive in cpu_util

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YDdlmUrBiHgXMJTm@google.com>
Date:   Thu, 25 Feb 2021 08:53:45 +0000
From:   Quentin Perret <qperret@...gle.com>
To:     vincent.donnefort@....com
Cc:     peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
        dietmar.eggemann@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        patrick.bellasi@...bug.net, valentin.schneider@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] sched/fair: use lsub_positive in cpu_util_next()

On Thursday 25 Feb 2021 at 08:36:12 (+0000), vincent.donnefort@....com wrote:
> From: Vincent Donnefort <vincent.donnefort@....com>
> 
> The sub_positive local version is saving an explicit load-store and is
> enough for the cpu_util_next() usage.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vincent Donnefort <vincent.donnefort@....com>

Reviewed-by: Quentin Perret <qperret@...gle.com>

Thanks,
Quentin