[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YDdz9JwcwuqV3GaW@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 10:55:00 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com>
Cc: Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/6] x86: prefetch_page() vDSO call
On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 01:32:56AM -0800, Nadav Amit wrote:
> > On Feb 25, 2021, at 12:52 AM, Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@...il.com> wrote:
> > Can you give me a reference to the “removing explicit prefetch from some
> > parts of the kernel”?
75d65a425c01 ("hlist: remove software prefetching in hlist iterators")
e66eed651fd1 ("list: remove prefetching from regular list iterators")
> Oh. I get it - you mean we remove we remove the use of explicit memory
> prefetch from the kernel code. Well, I don’t think it is really related,
> but yes, performance numbers are needed.
Right, so my main worry was that use of the prefetch instruction
actually hurt performance once the hardware prefetchers got smart
enough, this being a very similar construct (just on a different level
of the stack) should be careful not to suffer the same fate.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists