linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.4 10/17] mm: simplify follow

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 25 Feb 2021 10:53:55 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>,
        Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
        Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.4 10/17] mm: simplify follow_pte{,pmd}

From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>

commit ff5c19ed4b087073cea38ff0edc80c23d7256943 upstream.

Merge __follow_pte_pmd, follow_pte_pmd and follow_pte into a single
follow_pte function and just pass two additional NULL arguments for the
two previous follow_pte callers.

[sfr@...b.auug.org.au: merge fix for "s390/pci: remove races against pte updates"]
  Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201111221254.7f6a3658@canb.auug.org.au

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201029101432.47011-3-hch@lst.de
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Reviewed-by: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 fs/dax.c           |    9 ++++-----
 include/linux/mm.h |    6 +++---
 mm/memory.c        |   35 +++++------------------------------
 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/dax.c
+++ b/fs/dax.c
@@ -794,12 +794,11 @@ static void dax_entry_mkclean(struct add
 		address = pgoff_address(index, vma);
 
 		/*
-		 * Note because we provide range to follow_pte_pmd it will
-		 * call mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start() on our behalf
-		 * before taking any lock.
+		 * Note because we provide range to follow_pte it will call
+		 * mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start() on our behalf before
+		 * taking any lock.
 		 */
-		if (follow_pte_pmd(vma->vm_mm, address, &range,
-				   &ptep, &pmdp, &ptl))
+		if (follow_pte(vma->vm_mm, address, &range, &ptep, &pmdp, &ptl))
 			continue;
 
 		/*
--- a/include/linux/mm.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm.h
@@ -1466,9 +1466,9 @@ void free_pgd_range(struct mmu_gather *t
 		unsigned long end, unsigned long floor, unsigned long ceiling);
 int copy_page_range(struct mm_struct *dst, struct mm_struct *src,
 			struct vm_area_struct *vma);
-int follow_pte_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
-		   struct mmu_notifier_range *range,
-		   pte_t **ptepp, pmd_t **pmdpp, spinlock_t **ptlp);
+int follow_pte(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
+		struct mmu_notifier_range *range, pte_t **ptepp, pmd_t **pmdpp,
+		spinlock_t **ptlp);
 int follow_pfn(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
 	unsigned long *pfn);
 int follow_phys(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long address,
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -4222,9 +4222,9 @@ int __pmd_alloc(struct mm_struct *mm, pu
 }
 #endif /* __PAGETABLE_PMD_FOLDED */
 
-static int __follow_pte_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
-			    struct mmu_notifier_range *range,
-			    pte_t **ptepp, pmd_t **pmdpp, spinlock_t **ptlp)
+int follow_pte(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
+	       struct mmu_notifier_range *range, pte_t **ptepp, pmd_t **pmdpp,
+	       spinlock_t **ptlp)
 {
 	pgd_t *pgd;
 	p4d_t *p4d;
@@ -4289,31 +4289,6 @@ out:
 	return -EINVAL;
 }
 
-static inline int follow_pte(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
-			     pte_t **ptepp, spinlock_t **ptlp)
-{
-	int res;
-
-	/* (void) is needed to make gcc happy */
-	(void) __cond_lock(*ptlp,
-			   !(res = __follow_pte_pmd(mm, address, NULL,
-						    ptepp, NULL, ptlp)));
-	return res;
-}
-
-int follow_pte_pmd(struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long address,
-		   struct mmu_notifier_range *range,
-		   pte_t **ptepp, pmd_t **pmdpp, spinlock_t **ptlp)
-{
-	int res;
-
-	/* (void) is needed to make gcc happy */
-	(void) __cond_lock(*ptlp,
-			   !(res = __follow_pte_pmd(mm, address, range,
-						    ptepp, pmdpp, ptlp)));
-	return res;
-}
-
 /**
  * follow_pfn - look up PFN at a user virtual address
  * @vma: memory mapping
@@ -4334,7 +4309,7 @@ int follow_pfn(struct vm_area_struct *vm
 	if (!(vma->vm_flags & (VM_IO | VM_PFNMAP)))
 		return ret;
 
-	ret = follow_pte(vma->vm_mm, address, &ptep, &ptl);
+	ret = follow_pte(vma->vm_mm, address, NULL, &ptep, NULL, &ptl);
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
 	*pfn = pte_pfn(*ptep);
@@ -4355,7 +4330,7 @@ int follow_phys(struct vm_area_struct *v
 	if (!(vma->vm_flags & (VM_IO | VM_PFNMAP)))
 		goto out;
 
-	if (follow_pte(vma->vm_mm, address, &ptep, &ptl))
+	if (follow_pte(vma->vm_mm, address, NULL, &ptep, NULL, &ptl))
 		goto out;
 	pte = *ptep;