[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6bf917f3-1581-25ca-1330-3084194a4973@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 12:46:30 +0100
From: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
To: vincent.donnefort@....com, peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com,
vincent.guittot@...aro.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, qperret@...gle.com,
patrick.bellasi@...bug.net, valentin.schneider@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] sched/fair: use lsub_positive in cpu_util_next()
On 25/02/2021 09:36, vincent.donnefort@....com wrote:
> From: Vincent Donnefort <vincent.donnefort@....com>
>
> The sub_positive local version is saving an explicit load-store and is
> enough for the cpu_util_next() usage.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vincent Donnefort <vincent.donnefort@....com>
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 146ac9fec4b6..1364f8b95214 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -6525,7 +6525,7 @@ static unsigned long cpu_util_next(int cpu, struct task_struct *p, int dst_cpu)
> * util_avg should already be correct.
> */
> if (task_cpu(p) == cpu && dst_cpu != cpu)
> - sub_positive(&util, task_util(p));
> + lsub_positive(&util, task_util(p));
> else if (task_cpu(p) != cpu && dst_cpu == cpu)
> util += task_util(p);
Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists