[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210225165820.1377125-1-vincent.donnefort@arm.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 16:58:20 +0000
From: Vincent Donnefort <vincent.donnefort@....com>
To: peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...dhat.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org
Cc: dietmar.eggemann@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
patrick.bellasi@...bug.net, valentin.schneider@....com,
Vincent Donnefort <vincent.donnefort@....com>
Subject: [PATCH v2] sched/pelt: Fix task util_est update filtering
Being called for each dequeue, util_est reduces the number of its updates
by filtering out when the EWMA signal is different from the task util_avg
by less than 1%. It is a problem for a sudden util_avg ramp-up. Due to the
decay from a previous high util_avg, EWMA might now be close enough to
the new util_avg. No update would then happen while it would leave
ue.enqueued with an out-of-date value.
Taking into consideration the two util_est members, EWMA and enqueued for
the filtering, ensures, for both, an up-to-date value.
This is for now an issue only for the trace probe that might return the
stale value. Functional-wise, it isn't a problem, as the value is always
accessed through max(enqueued, ewma).
This problem has been observed using LISA's UtilConvergence:test_means on
the sd845c board.
No regression observed with Hackbench on sd845c and Perf-bench sched pipe
on hikey/hikey960.
Signed-off-by: Vincent Donnefort <vincent.donnefort@....com>
Reviewed-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 9e4104ae39ae..214e02862994 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -3966,24 +3966,27 @@ static inline void util_est_dequeue(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq,
trace_sched_util_est_cfs_tp(cfs_rq);
}
+#define UTIL_EST_MARGIN (SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE / 100)
+
/*
- * Check if a (signed) value is within a specified (unsigned) margin,
+ * Check if a (signed) value is within the (unsigned) util_est margin,
* based on the observation that:
*
* abs(x) < y := (unsigned)(x + y - 1) < (2 * y - 1)
*
- * NOTE: this only works when value + maring < INT_MAX.
+ * NOTE: this only works when value + UTIL_EST_MARGIN < INT_MAX.
*/
-static inline bool within_margin(int value, int margin)
+static inline bool util_est_within_margin(int value)
{
- return ((unsigned int)(value + margin - 1) < (2 * margin - 1));
+ return ((unsigned int)(value + UTIL_EST_MARGIN - 1) <
+ (2 * UTIL_EST_MARGIN - 1));
}
static inline void util_est_update(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq,
struct task_struct *p,
bool task_sleep)
{
- long last_ewma_diff;
+ long last_ewma_diff, last_enqueued_diff;
struct util_est ue;
if (!sched_feat(UTIL_EST))
@@ -4004,6 +4007,8 @@ static inline void util_est_update(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq,
if (ue.enqueued & UTIL_AVG_UNCHANGED)
return;
+ last_enqueued_diff = ue.enqueued;
+
/*
* Reset EWMA on utilization increases, the moving average is used only
* to smooth utilization decreases.
@@ -4017,12 +4022,17 @@ static inline void util_est_update(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq,
}
/*
- * Skip update of task's estimated utilization when its EWMA is
+ * Skip update of task's estimated utilization when its members are
* already ~1% close to its last activation value.
*/
last_ewma_diff = ue.enqueued - ue.ewma;
- if (within_margin(last_ewma_diff, (SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE / 100)))
+ last_enqueued_diff -= ue.enqueued;
+ if (util_est_within_margin(last_ewma_diff)) {
+ if (!util_est_within_margin(last_enqueued_diff))
+ goto done;
+
return;
+ }
/*
* To avoid overestimation of actual task utilization, skip updates if
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists