lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210225181812.GA5046@ashkalra_ubuntu_server>
Date:   Thu, 25 Feb 2021 18:18:12 +0000
From:   Ashish Kalra <ashish.kalra@....com>
To:     James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
Cc:     natet@...gle.com, brijesh.singh@....com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pbonzini@...hat.com,
        rientjes@...gle.com, seanjc@...gle.com, srutherford@...gle.com,
        thomas.lendacky@....com, x86@...nel.org,
        Tobin Feldman-Fitzthum <tobin@....com>,
        DOV MURIK <Dov.Murik1@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] KVM: x86: Support KVM VMs sharing SEV context

>> > For additional context, we need a Migration Helper because SEV PSP
>> > migration is far too slow for our live migration on its own. Using an
>> > in-guest migrator lets us speed this up significantly.
>> 
>> We have the same problem here at IBM, hence the RFC referred to above.
>> 

I do believe that some of these alternative SEV live migration support
or Migration helper (MH) solutions will still use SEV PSP migration for 
migrating the MH itself, therefore the SEV live migration patches
(currently v10 posted upstream) still make sense and will be used.

Thanks,
Ashish

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ