linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180: Use pdc interrupts for USB instead of GIC interrupts

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAD=FV=VFtWkfP30bPZB9SO5KLX_OLVNw0Fv3efZMHEzRg7PtVQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 25 Feb 2021 10:15:33 -0800
From:   Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To:     Sandeep Maheswaram <sanm@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        Felipe Balbi <balbi@...nel.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
        Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux USB List <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Manu Gautam <mgautam@...eaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180: Use pdc interrupts for
 USB instead of GIC interrupts

Hi,

On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 1:38 PM Sandeep Maheswaram <sanm@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>
> Using pdc interrupts for USB instead of GIC interrupts to
> support wake up in case of XO shutdown.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sandeep Maheswaram <sanm@...eaurora.org>
> Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi | 8 ++++----
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi
> index a02776c..a2c56528 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi
> @@ -2687,10 +2687,10 @@
>                                           <&gcc GCC_USB30_PRIM_MASTER_CLK>;
>                         assigned-clock-rates = <19200000>, <150000000>;
>
> -                       interrupts = <GIC_SPI 131 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> -                                    <GIC_SPI 486 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> -                                    <GIC_SPI 488 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> -                                    <GIC_SPI 489 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;
> +                       interrupts-extended = <&intc GIC_SPI 131 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> +                                             <&pdc 6 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> +                                             <&pdc 8 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>,
> +                                             <&pdc 9 IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_HIGH>;

Is there any reason that this patch can't land?  I'm not sure what the
current status of everything is, but it should be fine to go through
the PDC anyway, right?

-Doug