[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0c0c8e86-cf60-12d1-2260-2a7215493fd5@oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 10:48:04 -0800
From: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
To: Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@...gle.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Chinwen Chang <chinwen.chang@...iatek.com>,
Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Jerome Glisse <jglisse@...hat.com>,
Lokesh Gidra <lokeshgidra@...gle.com>,
"Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" <willy@...radead.org>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>, Shaohua Li <shli@...com>,
Shawn Anastasio <shawn@...stas.io>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Steven Price <steven.price@....com>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Adam Ruprecht <ruprecht@...gle.com>,
Cannon Matthews <cannonmatthews@...gle.com>,
"Dr . David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@...hat.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>,
Oliver Upton <oupton@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/6] userfaultfd: add minor fault registration mode
On 2/25/21 9:49 AM, Axel Rasmussen wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 4:26 PM Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com> wrote:
>>
>> On 2/18/21 4:48 PM, Axel Rasmussen wrote:
>> <snip>
>>> @@ -401,8 +398,10 @@ vm_fault_t handle_userfault(struct vm_fault *vmf, unsigned long reason)
>>>
>>> BUG_ON(ctx->mm != mm);
>>>
>>> - VM_BUG_ON(reason & ~(VM_UFFD_MISSING|VM_UFFD_WP));
>>> - VM_BUG_ON(!(reason & VM_UFFD_MISSING) ^ !!(reason & VM_UFFD_WP));
>>> + /* Any unrecognized flag is a bug. */
>>> + VM_BUG_ON(reason & ~__VM_UFFD_FLAGS);
>>> + /* 0 or > 1 flags set is a bug; we expect exactly 1. */
>>> + VM_BUG_ON(!reason || !!(reason & (reason - 1)));
>>
>> I may be confused, but that seems to be checking for a flag value of 1
>> as opposed to one flag being set?
>
> (Assuming I implemented it correctly!) It's the logical negation of
> this trick: https://graphics.stanford.edu/~seander/bithacks.html#DetermineIfPowerOf2
> So, it's "VM_BUG_ON(reason is *not* a power of 2)".
>
> Maybe the double negation makes it overly confusing? It ought to be
> equivalent if we remove it and just say:
> VM_BUG_ON(!reason || (reason & (reason - 1)));
Sorry, my bad. In my mind I was thinking,
VM_BUG_ON(!reason || !!(reason && (reason - 1)));
--
Mike Kravetz
Powered by blists - more mailing lists