[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2eb68f3c-d088-2b4d-2eec-347d7b11decc@somainline.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2021 20:27:20 +0100
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, phone-devel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: ~postmarketos/upstreaming@...ts.sr.ht, martin.botka@...ainline.org,
angelogioacchino.delregno@...ainline.org,
marijn.suijten@...ainline.org, Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Taniya Das <tdas@...eaurora.org>,
Craig Tatlor <ctatlor97@...il.com>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] clk: qcom: gcc-sdm660: Add CLK_SET_RATE_PARENT where
applicable
On 23.02.2021 01:42, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Konrad Dybcio (2021-02-20 07:56:17)
>> Some branch clocks should explicitly set this flag to make sure
>> they inherit their frequencies from the parent clock.
> This flag doesn't have anything to do with inheriting the rate from the
> parent.
>
Right. "Some branch clocks should explicitly set this flag to make sure the frequency changes are propagated to their respective parents if need be." should sound better.
Konrad
Powered by blists - more mailing lists