linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/23] 5.10.19-rc1 review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8ec51c24-4c48-076e-2294-e27da7e7a2c4@huawei.com>
Date:   Fri, 26 Feb 2021 14:44:12 +0800
From:   Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        <linux@...ck-us.net>, <shuah@...nel.org>, <patches@...nelci.org>,
        <lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org>, <pavel@...x.de>,
        <jonathanh@...dia.com>, <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/23] 5.10.19-rc1 review

Hi Greg,

On 2021/2/25 17:53, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.19 release.
> There are 23 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
> 
> Responses should be made by Sat, 27 Feb 2021 09:25:06 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.

It takes longer time to set up our test farm than I expected,
for now we can run test on x86 for stable 5.10, test for
ARM64 server and other stable kernels (4.19 and 5.4) is
in progress (needs more machines and a rack in the data
center), please give us a bit more time to get things ready.

Here is the test results for x86, compiled and booted OK,
also no regressions for the functional test [1] (the failed
ones are the mismatch of the testcase and the test environment,
not the kernel failures),

Tested-by: Hulk Robot <hulkci@...wei.com>

Thanks
Hanjun

[1]:
Kernel repo: 
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable-rc.git

Branch: linux-5.10.y

Arch: x86

Version: 5.10.19-rc1+

Commit: 6ffb943c0e01d843a06842f9a7bcfc008e10a6d2

Compiler: gcc version 8.3.1 (GCC)

--------------------------------------------------------------------

Testcase Result Summary:

total_num: 4739

succeed_num: 4732

failed_num: 7

timeout_num: 0

--------------------------------------------------------------------

Testsuites List:

autotest

crackerjack

kernel_selftests

ltp-aiodio

ltp-aio-stress

ltp-controllers

ltp-openposix

ltp-can

ltp-cap_bounds

ltp-commands

ltp-connectors

ltp-containers

ltp-cpuhotplug

ltp-crashme

ltp-crypto

ltp-cve

ltp-dio

ltp-dma_thread_diotest

ltp-fcntl-locktests

ltp-filecaps

ltp-fs

ltp-fs_bind

ltp-fs_perms_simple

ltp-fs_readonly

ltp-fsx

ltp-hugetlb

ltp-hyperthreading

ltp-ima

ltp-input

ltp-io

ltp-io_cd

ltp-io_floppy

ltp-ipc

ltp-kernel_misc

ltp-fsstress

ltp-fsx-linux

ltp-math

ltp-mm

ltp-nptl

ltp-numa

ltp-power_management_tests

ltp-power_management_tests_exclusive

ltp-pty

ltp-sched

ltp-scsi_debug

ltp-securebits

ltp-smack

ltp-smoketest

ltp-syscalls

ltp-tracing

ltp-uevent

ltp-realtime

memory_ksm

security_audit