linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] counter: add IRQ or GPIO based event counter

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YDicHHebw9scA7to@shinobu>
Date:   Fri, 26 Feb 2021 15:58:36 +0900
From:   William Breathitt Gray <vilhelm.gray@...il.com>
To:     Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
Cc:     devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@...gutronix.de>,
        linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
        Robin van der Gracht <robin@...tonic.nl>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        David Jander <david@...tonic.nl>,
        Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] counter: add IRQ or GPIO based event counter

On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 07:46:01AM +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 05:20:21PM +0900, William Breathitt Gray wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 05:11:03PM +0900, William Breathitt Gray wrote:
> > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 08:35:06AM +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 11:34:06AM +0900, William Breathitt Gray wrote:
> > > > > Alternatively, we can take a more generic approach: ignore the GPIO
> > > > > names and focus solely on the IRQ lines; because the GPIO lines will
> > > > > always be tied to respective IRQ lines here, using the IRQ as the basis
> > > > > of the name should always be valid. The "name" member of the struct
> > > > > irq_chip can work for this. I haven't tested this, but I think something
> > > > > like this would work:
> > > > > 
> > > > > 	cnt_signals[0].name = irq_get_chip(priv->irq)->name;
> > > > 
> > > > ok, i'll take a look at it.
> > > 
> > > If that doesn't work, then use devm_kasprintf() to generate the name
> > > based on the IRQ line number. The idea here is that the user should be
> > > able to identify that the Signal component for this Count is the
> > > respective IRQ.
> > > 
> > > William Breathitt Gray
> > 
> > I realized that these irq_chip names are often just the device name
> > which isn't very useful either. :-(
> > 
> > In that case, I suppose we really are just left with generating the name
> > based on the IRQ line number then. This should be fine then:
> > 
> > 	cnt_signals[0].name = devm_kasprintf(dev, GFP_KERNEL, "IRQ %d",
> > 					     priv->irq);
> > 	if (!cnt_signals[0].name)
> > 		return -ENOMEM;
> > 
> > I think this would make it clear to the user that this Signal is the
> > respective IRQ (whether sourced from GPIO or not).
> 
> ack, with one correction. cnt_signals should be allocated, otherwise
> this value will be set per driver not per device.
> 
> Regards,
> Oleksij
> -- 
> Pengutronix e.K.                           |                             |
> Steuerwalder Str. 21                       | http://www.pengutronix.de/  |
> 31137 Hildesheim, Germany                  | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0    |
> Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686           | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |

Yes you're right, cnt_signals will need to be allocated then because
these will be different per device.

Thanks,

William Breathitt Gray

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)