linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] kgdb: Fix to kill breakpoints on initmem after boot

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 26 Feb 2021 08:31:39 +0100
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>
Cc:     Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>,
        kgdb-bugreport@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
        Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>,
        Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, stefan.saecherl@....de,
        qy15sije@....cs.fau.de,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kgdb: Fix to kill breakpoints on initmem after boot

On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 12:32:07PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:
> + stable ML
> 
> On Thu, 25 Feb 2021 at 21:26, Daniel Thompson
> <daniel.thompson@...aro.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 01:46:52PM +0530, Sumit Garg wrote:
> > > Currently breakpoints in kernel .init.text section are not handled
> > > correctly while allowing to remove them even after corresponding pages
> > > have been freed.
> > >
> > > Fix it via killing .init.text section breakpoints just prior to initmem
> > > pages being freed.
> > >
> > > Suggested-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
> > > Signed-off-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@...aro.org>
> >
> > I saw Andrew has picked this one up. That's ok for me:
> > Acked-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>
> >
> > I already enriched kgdbtest to cover this (and they pass) so I guess
> > this is also:
> > Tested-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@...aro.org>
> >
> 
> Thanks Daniel.
> 
> > BTW this is not Cc:ed to stable and I do wonder if it crosses the
> > threshold to be considered a fix rather than a feature. Normally I
> > consider adding safety rails for kgdb to be a new feature but, in this
> > case, the problem would easily ensnare an inexperienced developer who is
> > doing nothing more than debugging their own driver (assuming they
> > correctly marked their probe function as .init) so I think this weighs
> > in favour of being a fix.
> >
> 
> Makes sense, Cc:ed stable.


<formletter>

This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the
stable kernel tree.  Please read:
    https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html
for how to do this properly.

</formletter>