[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YDi7rQKR/rQinyTH@alley>
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 10:13:17 +0100
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Timur Tabi <timur@...nel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] printk: clarify the documentation for plain pointer
printing
On Thu 2021-02-25 17:46:39, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> We have several modifiers for plain pointers (%p, %px and %pK) and now also
> the no_hash_pointers boot parameter. The documentation should help to choose
> which variant to use. Importantly, we should discourage %px in favour of %p
> (with the new boot parameter when debugging), and stress that %pK should be
> only used for procfs and similar files, not dmesg buffer. This patch clarifies
> the documentation in that regard.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Nice!
Reviewed-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Best Regards,
Petr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists