[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YDjL1zcCNDlFVKbj@aptenodytes>
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 11:22:15 +0100
From: Paul Kocialkowski <contact@...lk.fr>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>,
Samuel Holland <samuel@...lland.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the irqchip tree with the sunxi tree
Hi,
On Thu 18 Feb 21, 15:48, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Mon, 15 Feb 2021 09:11:24 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 1 Feb 2021 14:42:59 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> > >
> > > Today's linux-next merge of the irqchip tree got a conflict in:
> > >
> > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/allwinner,sun7i-a20-sc-nmi.yaml
> > >
> > > between commit:
> > >
> > > 752b0aac99c7 ("dt-bindings: irq: sun7i-nmi: Add binding documentation for the V3s NMI")
> > >
> > > from the sunxi tree and commit:
> > >
> > > ad6b47cdef76 ("dt-bindings: irq: sun6i-r: Split the binding from sun7i-nmi")
> > >
> > > from the irqchip tree.
> > >
> > > I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as
> > > necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
> > > non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
> > > when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider
> > > cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
> > > particularly complex conflicts.
> > >
> > > diff --cc Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/allwinner,sun7i-a20-sc-nmi.yaml
> > > index 4fd1e2780026,f34ecc8c7093..000000000000
> > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/allwinner,sun7i-a20-sc-nmi.yaml
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/allwinner,sun7i-a20-sc-nmi.yaml
> > > @@@ -25,17 -25,7 +25,10 @@@ properties
> > > - const: allwinner,sun6i-a31-sc-nmi
> > > deprecated: true
> > > - const: allwinner,sun7i-a20-sc-nmi
> > > - - items:
> > > - - const: allwinner,sun8i-a83t-r-intc
> > > - - const: allwinner,sun6i-a31-r-intc
> > > + - items:
> > > + - const: allwinner,sun8i-v3s-nmi
> > > + - const: allwinner,sun9i-a80-nmi
> > > - const: allwinner,sun9i-a80-nmi
> > > - - items:
> > > - - const: allwinner,sun50i-a64-r-intc
> > > - - const: allwinner,sun6i-a31-r-intc
> > > - items:
> > > - const: allwinner,sun50i-a100-nmi
> > > - const: allwinner,sun9i-a80-nmi
> >
> > With the merge window about to open, this is a reminder that this
> > conflict still exists. It is now between the arm-soc tree and the
> > irqchip tree.
>
> This is now a conflict between the arm-soc tree and the tip tree.
The resolution looks correct to me!
Cheers,
Paul
--
Developer of free digital technology and hardware support.
Website: https://www.paulk.fr/
Coding blog: https://code.paulk.fr/
Git repositories: https://git.paulk.fr/ https://git.code.paulk.fr/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists