lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALvZod4eE+nD=26SY6z6G3+Lzhucu3ERG7-ufLHPtsRXvXe8Fw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 26 Feb 2021 06:23:18 -0800
From:   Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>
To:     Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>
Cc:     Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>, Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Linux MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] doc: memcontrol: add description for oom_kill

On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 6:12 PM Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com> wrote:
>
> When debugging an oom issue, I found the oom_kill counter of memcg is
> confusing.  At the first glance without checking document, I thought it
> just counts for memcg oom, but it turns out it counts both global and
> memcg oom.
>
> The cgroup v2 documents it, but the description is missed for cgroup v1.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <shy828301@...il.com>

Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ