[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210226201721.510177-2-palmer@dabbelt.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 12:17:21 -0800
From: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>
To: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, atishp@...shpatra.org
Cc: peterz@...radead.org, srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
valentin.schneider@....com, vbabka@...e.cz, mpe@...erman.id.au,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@...gle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] topology: Guard node_reclaim_distance with CONFIFG_NUMA
From: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@...gle.com>
This is only defined (and useful) for CONFIG_NUMA, but isn't
conditionally declared. This makes users a bit more of a headache to
track down.
Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@...gle.com>
---
include/linux/topology.h | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/linux/topology.h b/include/linux/topology.h
index 7634cd737061..15f02281bdf0 100644
--- a/include/linux/topology.h
+++ b/include/linux/topology.h
@@ -73,7 +73,9 @@ int arch_update_cpu_topology(void);
* *improves* if allowed to reclaim memory and load balance tasks
* between NUMA nodes 2-hops apart.
*/
+#ifdef CONFIG_NUMA
extern int __read_mostly node_reclaim_distance;
+#endif
#ifndef PENALTY_FOR_NODE_WITH_CPUS
#define PENALTY_FOR_NODE_WITH_CPUS (1)
--
2.30.1.766.gb4fecdf3b7-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists