[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YDlufJLcYN2bzNYV@rikard>
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2021 22:56:12 +0100
From: Rikard Falkeborn <rikard.falkeborn@...il.com>
To: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
Cc: Rikard Falkeborn <rikard.falkeborn@...il.com>,
Peter Huewe <peterhuewe@....de>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
linux-integrity@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tpm/ppi: Constify static struct attribute_group
On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 04:04:18AM +0200, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 04, 2021 at 10:54:27PM +0100, Rikard Falkeborn wrote:
> > The only usage of ppi_attr_grp is to put its address in an array of
> > pointers to const struct attribute_group. Make it const to allow the
> > compiler to put it in read-only memory.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rikard Falkeborn <rikard.falkeborn@...il.com>
>
> Thanks.
>
> Reviewed-by: Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>
>
> /Jarkko
>
Hi Jarkko,
I saw this was merged as commit
90cba8d20f8b09d62a25f9864cb8e67722d76c3a, but in the commit, there was an
additional change where a call to dump_stack() was added in
drivers/char/tpm/tpm-chip.c, was this intentional?
/Rikard
Powered by blists - more mailing lists