[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5cf5692ef7d348ec361081d0341f1254@codeaurora.org>
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2021 19:26:02 +0530
From: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@...eaurora.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@...eaurora.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Sibi Sankar <sibis@...eaurora.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] arm64: dts: qcom: sc7280: Add AOSS QMP node
On 2021-02-27 00:16, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Sai Prakash Ranjan (2021-02-25 23:51:00)
>> On 2021-02-26 01:11, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> > Quoting Sai Prakash Ranjan (2021-02-25 01:30:24)
>> >> Add a DT node for the AOSS QMP on SC7280 SoC.
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@...eaurora.org>
>> >> ---
>> >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi | 14 ++++++++++++++
>> >> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
>> >>
>> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
>> >> b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
>> >> index 65c1e0f2fb56..cbd567ccc04e 100644
>> >> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
>> >> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
>> >> @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@
>> >> #include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,rpmh.h>
>> >> #include <dt-bindings/interrupt-controller/arm-gic.h>
>> >> #include <dt-bindings/mailbox/qcom-ipcc.h>
>> >> +#include <dt-bindings/power/qcom-aoss-qmp.h>
>> >> #include <dt-bindings/soc/qcom,rpmh-rsc.h>
>> >>
>> >> / {
>> >> @@ -368,6 +369,19 @@ pdc: interrupt-controller@...0000 {
>> >> interrupt-controller;
>> >> };
>> >>
>> >> + aoss_qmp: qmp@...0000 {
>> >
>> > power-domain-controller@...0000? power-controller@...0000?
>> >
>>
>> Its an AOSS message RAM and all other SM* SoCs have as qmp@
>> and the dt binding as well, I see only SM8150 with power-controller,
>> that should probably be fixed?
>
> Node name should be generic while still being meaningful. Nobody knows
> what qmp is, but power-controller makes sense. Can you fix this and the
> others to be power-controller?
>
Ok makes sense, I will post changing others as well and see if we get
any comments there.
Thanks,
Sai
--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a
member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
Powered by blists - more mailing lists