linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 13/13] arm64: dts: qcom: Add sc7180-lazor-coachz skus

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAD=FV=VY3V=8ii+E_Yva3i-HngKwFj9u8W_6pkLe-c2gG0Oz3A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 26 Feb 2021 16:55:37 -0800
From:   Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To:     Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
Cc:     Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
        Alexandru M Stan <amstan@...omium.org>,
        Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
        Rob Clark <robdclark@...omium.org>,
        Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@...omium.org>,
        Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@...omium.org>,
        Judy Hsiao <judyhsiao@...omium.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
        <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/13] arm64: dts: qcom: Add sc7180-lazor-coachz skus

Hi,

On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 10:45 AM Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org> wrote:
>
> Quoting Douglas Anderson (2021-02-25 14:13:10)
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-trogdor-coachz.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-trogdor-coachz.dtsi
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..5def9953d82b
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-trogdor-coachz.dtsi
> > @@ -0,0 +1,249 @@
> [...]
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * There's no SAR sensor, so i2c5 is re-purposed.  We leave the
> > + * proximity@28 node under i2c5 (from trogdor.dtsi) since it's "disabled"
> > + * and doesn't hurt.
> > + */
> > +i2c_wlc: &i2c5 {
> > +       /* Currently not connected to anything; see b/168652326 */
> > +};
>
> Can we remove this? As far as I know this will always be this way and
> thus doesn't provide anything meaningful to leave this bug comment here
> that doesn't work for people.

Yeah, that sounds good.  We just want to delete this whole comment and the node.

That seems like enough reason to repost the series.  I'll plan to do
it early next week.  Of course, I wouldn't object to any of these
things:
* This patch landing and having the node and I'll do a follow-up patch
to remove it.
* Bjorn removing the comment and node as he applies.

-Doug