lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Sat, 27 Feb 2021 09:47:45 +0800
From:   Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        <linux@...ck-us.net>, <shuah@...nel.org>, <patches@...nelci.org>,
        <lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org>, <pavel@...x.de>,
        <jonathanh@...dia.com>, <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/23] 5.10.19-rc1 review

On 2021/2/26 14:44, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> On 2021/2/25 17:53, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.19 release.
>> There are 23 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>> to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>> let me know.
>>
>> Responses should be made by Sat, 27 Feb 2021 09:25:06 +0000.
>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
> 
> It takes longer time to set up our test farm than I expected,
> for now we can run test on x86 for stable 5.10, test for
> ARM64 server and other stable kernels (4.19 and 5.4) is
> in progress (needs more machines and a rack in the data
> center), please give us a bit more time to get things ready.
> 
> Here is the test results for x86, compiled and booted OK,
> also no regressions for the functional test [1] (the failed
> ones are the mismatch of the testcase and the test environment,
> not the kernel failures),

Although 5.10.19 is released, it's better to report the ARM64
test results as well:

Testcase Result Summary:

total_num: 4732

succeed_num: 4732

failed_num: 0

timeout_num: 0

Thanks
Hanjun

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ