[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <afd3980f-bf3a-7860-052c-cbea502e3c35@huawei.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2021 09:47:45 +0800
From: Hanjun Guo <guohanjun@...wei.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
<linux@...ck-us.net>, <shuah@...nel.org>, <patches@...nelci.org>,
<lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org>, <pavel@...x.de>,
<jonathanh@...dia.com>, <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
<stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/23] 5.10.19-rc1 review
On 2021/2/26 14:44, Hanjun Guo wrote:
> Hi Greg,
>
> On 2021/2/25 17:53, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.19 release.
>> There are 23 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>> let me know.
>>
>> Responses should be made by Sat, 27 Feb 2021 09:25:06 +0000.
>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
> It takes longer time to set up our test farm than I expected,
> for now we can run test on x86 for stable 5.10, test for
> ARM64 server and other stable kernels (4.19 and 5.4) is
> in progress (needs more machines and a rack in the data
> center), please give us a bit more time to get things ready.
>
> Here is the test results for x86, compiled and booted OK,
> also no regressions for the functional test [1] (the failed
> ones are the mismatch of the testcase and the test environment,
> not the kernel failures),
Although 5.10.19 is released, it's better to report the ARM64
test results as well:
Testcase Result Summary:
total_num: 4732
succeed_num: 4732
failed_num: 0
timeout_num: 0
Thanks
Hanjun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists