linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] fs: dlm: Spellings fixed throughout the fle lock.c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 27 Feb 2021 16:15:18 -0800
From:   Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
To:     Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@...il.com>, ccaulfie@...hat.com,
        teigland@...hat.com, cluster-devel@...hat.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs: dlm: Spellings fixed throughout the fle lock.c

On 2/27/21 3:33 PM, Bhaskar Chowdhury wrote:
> 
> Few spelling fixes throughout the file.
> 

in Subject: s/fle/file/

> Signed-off-by: Bhaskar Chowdhury <unixbhaskar@...il.com>
> ---
>  fs/dlm/lock.c | 10 +++++-----
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/dlm/lock.c b/fs/dlm/lock.c
> index 002123efc6b0..efcd84faca14 100644
> --- a/fs/dlm/lock.c
> +++ b/fs/dlm/lock.c
> @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ static void del_timeout(struct dlm_lkb *lkb);
>  static void toss_rsb(struct kref *kref);
> 
>  /*
> - * Lock compatibilty matrix - thanks Steve
> + * Lock compatibility matrix - thanks Steve
>   * UN = Unlocked state. Not really a state, used as a flag
>   * PD = Padding. Used to make the matrix a nice power of two in size
>   * Other states are the same as the VMS DLM.
> @@ -594,7 +594,7 @@ static int find_rsb_dir(struct dlm_ls *ls, char *name, int len,
>  	error = dlm_search_rsb_tree(&ls->ls_rsbtbl[b].keep, name, len, &r);
>  	if (error)
>  		goto do_toss;
> -
> +

stray change?

>  	/*
>  	 * rsb is active, so we can't check master_nodeid without lock_rsb.
>  	 */
> @@ -2357,14 +2357,14 @@ static int _can_be_granted(struct dlm_rsb *r, struct dlm_lkb *lkb, int now,
>  	 * 6-5: But the default algorithm for deciding whether to grant or
>  	 * queue conversion requests does not by itself guarantee that such
>  	 * requests are serviced on a "first come first serve" basis.  This, in
> -	 * turn, can lead to a phenomenon known as "indefinate postponement".
> +	 * turn, can lead to a phenomenon known as "indefinite postponement".
>  	 *
>  	 * 6-7: This issue is dealt with by using the optional QUECVT flag with
>  	 * the system service employed to request a lock conversion.  This flag
>  	 * forces certain conversion requests to be queued, even if they are
>  	 * compatible with the granted modes of other locks on the same
>  	 * resource.  Thus, the use of this flag results in conversion requests
> -	 * being ordered on a "first come first servce" basis.
> +	 * being ordered on a "first come first serve" basis.
>  	 *
>  	 * DCT: This condition is all about new conversions being able to occur
>  	 * "in place" while the lock remains on the granted queue (assuming
> @@ -5745,7 +5745,7 @@ int dlm_recover_process_copy(struct dlm_ls *ls, struct dlm_rcom *rc)
> 
>  		log_debug(ls, "dlm_recover_process_copy %x remote %d %x %d",
>  			  lkid, rc->rc_header.h_nodeid, remid, result);
> -
> +

stray change?

>  		dlm_send_rcom_lock(r, lkb);
>  		goto out;
>  	case -EEXIST:
> --


-- 
~Randy