linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] devfreq: rk3399_dmc: Simplify with dev_err

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <8c7f16ac-2287-eddb-e074-90cfec56500b@gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 28 Feb 2021 15:58:26 +0900
From:   Chanwoo Choi <cwchoi00@...il.com>
To:     Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
        Chanwoo Choi <chanwoo@...nel.org>
Cc:     MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
        Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
        Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
        Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] devfreq: rk3399_dmc: Simplify with dev_err_probe()

On 21. 2. 28. 오전 1:35, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Aug 2020 at 15:10, Chanwoo Choi <chanwoo@...nel.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Sat, Aug 29, 2020 at 12:31 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> Common pattern of handling deferred probe can be simplified with
>>> dev_err_probe().  Less code and the error value gets printed.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/devfreq/rk3399_dmc.c | 20 ++++++--------------
>>>   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/devfreq/rk3399_dmc.c b/drivers/devfreq/rk3399_dmc.c
>>> index 027769e39f9b..35b3542f1f7b 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/devfreq/rk3399_dmc.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/devfreq/rk3399_dmc.c
>>> @@ -324,22 +324,14 @@ static int rk3399_dmcfreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>          mutex_init(&data->lock);
>>>
>>>          data->vdd_center = devm_regulator_get(dev, "center");
>>> -       if (IS_ERR(data->vdd_center)) {
>>> -               if (PTR_ERR(data->vdd_center) == -EPROBE_DEFER)
>>> -                       return -EPROBE_DEFER;
>>> -
>>> -               dev_err(dev, "Cannot get the regulator \"center\"\n");
>>> -               return PTR_ERR(data->vdd_center);
>>> -       }
>>> +       if (IS_ERR(data->vdd_center))
>>> +               return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(data->vdd_center),
>>> +                                    "Cannot get the regulator \"center\"\n");
>>>
>>>          data->dmc_clk = devm_clk_get(dev, "dmc_clk");
>>> -       if (IS_ERR(data->dmc_clk)) {
>>> -               if (PTR_ERR(data->dmc_clk) == -EPROBE_DEFER)
>>> -                       return -EPROBE_DEFER;
>>> -
>>> -               dev_err(dev, "Cannot get the clk dmc_clk\n");
>>> -               return PTR_ERR(data->dmc_clk);
>>> -       }
>>> +       if (IS_ERR(data->dmc_clk))
>>> +               return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(data->dmc_clk),
>>> +                                    "Cannot get the clk dmc_clk\n");
>>>
>>>          data->edev = devfreq_event_get_edev_by_phandle(dev, 0);
>>>          if (IS_ERR(data->edev))
>>> --
>>> 2.17.1
>>>
>>
>> Applied it. Thanks.
> 
> Hi Chanwoo,
> 
> Do you know what happened with this patch? You replied that it is
> applied but I cannot find it in the Linus' or next trees.
> 

Hi Krzysztof,

There was some my mistake. I'm sorry.
I applied it again to next branch.

-- 
Best Regards,
Samsung Electronics
Chanwoo Choi