[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210301100737.GB32425@linux>
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2021 11:07:38 +0100
From: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>
To: David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>, VlastimilBabkavbabka@...e.cz,
pasha.tatashin@...een.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] x86/Kconfig: Introduce
ARCH_MHP_MEMMAP_ON_MEMORY_ENABLE
On Mon, Mar 01, 2021 at 09:45:07AM +0100, David Hildenbrand wrote:
> Take your config and set
> X86_5LEVEL=n
> (because it enforces SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP)
> and
> SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP=n
>
> When compiling, you'll end up with a config like
> CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP_ENABLE=y
> # CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP is not set
I see
>
> Yet, with your patch you would get
>
> ARCH_MHP_MEMMAP_ON_MEMORY_ENABLE=y
>
> And it would not get fenced off in the code, right?
>
>
> I think you either have to check (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP)) in
> addition in your code, or enforce it differently. Like
>
>
> config MHP_MEMMAP_ON_MEMORY
> depends on SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP && ARCH_MHP_MEMMAP_ON_MEMORY_ENABLE
> bool
>
>
> Then you can simplify the arch Kconfig settings, removing the sparesemem
> dependency there.
Yes, will do it this way.
Thanks!
--
Oscar Salvador
SUSE L3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists