| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2021 02:08:04 +0000
From: "Zhang, Qiang" <Qiang.Zhang@...driver.com>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
syzbot <syzbot+28abd693db9e92c160d8@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
"asml.silence@...il.com" <asml.silence@...il.com>,
"io-uring@...r.kernel.org" <io-uring@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com" <syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com>,
"viro@...iv.linux.org.uk" <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: 回复: possible deadlock in io_poll_double_wake (2)
________________________________________
发件人: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
发送时间: 2021年3月1日 7:08
收件人: syzbot; asml.silence@...il.com; io-uring@...r.kernel.org; linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com; viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
主题: Re: possible deadlock in io_poll_double_wake (2)
[Please note: This e-mail is from an EXTERNAL e-mail address]
On 2/27/21 5:42 PM, syzbot wrote:
> syzbot has found a reproducer for the following issue on:
>
> HEAD commit: 5695e516 Merge tag 'io_uring-worker.v3-2021-02-25' of git:..
> git tree: upstream
> console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=114e3866d00000
> kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=8c76dad0946df1f3
> dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=28abd693db9e92c160d8
> syz repro: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.syz?x=122ed9b6d00000
> C reproducer: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/repro.c?x=14d5a292d00000
>
> IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit:
> Reported-by: syzbot+28abd693db9e92c160d8@...kaller.appspotmail.com
>
> ============================================
> WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
> 5.11.0-syzkaller #0 Not tainted
> --------------------------------------------
> swapper/1/0 is trying to acquire lock:
> ffff88801b2b1130 (&runtime->sleep){..-.}-{2:2}, at: spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:354 [inline]
> ffff88801b2b1130 (&runtime->sleep){..-.}-{2:2}, at: io_poll_double_wake+0x25f/0x6a0 fs/io_uring.c:4960
>
> but task is already holding lock:
> ffff88801b2b3130 (&runtime->sleep){..-.}-{2:2}, at: __wake_up_common_lock+0xb4/0x130 kernel/sched/wait.c:137
>
> other info that might help us debug this:
> Possible unsafe locking scenario:
>
> CPU0
> ----
> lock(&runtime->sleep);
> lock(&runtime->sleep);
>
> *** DEADLOCK ***
>
> May be due to missing lock nesting notation
>
> 2 locks held by swapper/1/0:
> #0: ffff888147474908 (&group->lock){..-.}-{2:2}, at: _snd_pcm_stream_lock_irqsave+0x9f/0xd0 sound/core/pcm_native.c:170
> #1: ffff88801b2b3130 (&runtime->sleep){..-.}-{2:2}, at: __wake_up_common_lock+0xb4/0x130 kernel/sched/wait.c:137
>
> stack backtrace:
> CPU: 1 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Not tainted 5.11.0-syzkaller #0
> Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011
> Call Trace:
> <IRQ>
> __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:79 [inline]
> dump_stack+0xfa/0x151 lib/dump_stack.c:120
> print_deadlock_bug kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2829 [inline]
> check_deadlock kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2872 [inline]
> validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3661 [inline]
> __lock_acquire.cold+0x14c/0x3b4 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4900
> lock_acquire kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5510 [inline]
> lock_acquire+0x1ab/0x730 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5475
> __raw_spin_lock include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:142 [inline]
> _raw_spin_lock+0x2a/0x40 kernel/locking/spinlock.c:151
> spin_lock include/linux/spinlock.h:354 [inline]
> io_poll_double_wake+0x25f/0x6a0 fs/io_uring.c:4960
> __wake_up_common+0x147/0x650 kernel/sched/wait.c:108
> __wake_up_common_lock+0xd0/0x130 kernel/sched/wait.c:138
> snd_pcm_update_state+0x46a/0x540 sound/core/pcm_lib.c:203
> snd_pcm_update_hw_ptr0+0xa75/0x1a50 sound/core/pcm_lib.c:464
> snd_pcm_period_elapsed+0x160/0x250 sound/core/pcm_lib.c:1805
> dummy_hrtimer_callback+0x94/0x1b0 sound/drivers/dummy.c:378
> __run_hrtimer kernel/time/hrtimer.c:1519 [inline]
> __hrtimer_run_queues+0x609/0xe40 kernel/time/hrtimer.c:1583
> hrtimer_run_softirq+0x17b/0x360 kernel/time/hrtimer.c:1600
> __do_softirq+0x29b/0x9f6 kernel/softirq.c:345
> invoke_softirq kernel/softirq.c:221 [inline]
> __irq_exit_rcu kernel/softirq.c:422 [inline]
> irq_exit_rcu+0x134/0x200 kernel/softirq.c:434
> sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x93/0xc0 arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic.c:1100
> </IRQ>
> asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x12/0x20 arch/x86/include/asm/idtentry.h:632
> RIP: 0010:native_save_fl arch/x86/include/asm/irqflags.h:29 [inline]
> RIP: 0010:arch_local_save_flags arch/x86/include/asm/irqflags.h:70 [inline]
> RIP: 0010:arch_irqs_disabled arch/x86/include/asm/irqflags.h:137 [inline]
> RIP: 0010:acpi_safe_halt drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c:111 [inline]
> RIP: 0010:acpi_idle_do_entry+0x1c9/0x250 drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c:516
> Code: dd 38 6e f8 84 db 75 ac e8 54 32 6e f8 e8 0f 1c 74 f8 e9 0c 00 00 00 e8 45 32 6e f8 0f 00 2d 4e 4a c5 00 e8 39 32 6e f8 fb f4 <9c> 5b 81 e3 00 02 00 00 fa 31 ff 48 89 de e8 14 3a 6e f8 48 85 db
> RSP: 0018:ffffc90000d47d18 EFLAGS: 00000293
> RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000000
> RDX: ffff8880115c3780 RSI: ffffffff89052537 RDI: 0000000000000000
> RBP: ffff888141127064 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000001
> R10: ffffffff81794168 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000001
> R13: ffff888141127000 R14: ffff888141127064 R15: ffff888143331804
> acpi_idle_enter+0x361/0x500 drivers/acpi/processor_idle.c:647
> cpuidle_enter_state+0x1b1/0xc80 drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c:237
> cpuidle_enter+0x4a/0xa0 drivers/cpuidle/cpuidle.c:351
> call_cpuidle kernel/sched/idle.c:158 [inline]
> cpuidle_idle_call kernel/sched/idle.c:239 [inline]
> do_idle+0x3e1/0x590 kernel/sched/idle.c:300
> cpu_startup_entry+0x14/0x20 kernel/sched/idle.c:397
> start_secondary+0x274/0x350 arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c:272
> secondary_startup_64_no_verify+0xb0/0xbb
>This looks very odd, only thing I can think of is someone >doing
>poll_wait() twice with different entries but for the same
>waitqueue head.
>
Hello Jens Axboe
here poll_wait() twice in waitqueue head 'runtime->sleep'
in sound/core/oss/pcm_oss.c
static __poll_t snd_pcm_oss_poll(struct file *file, poll_table * wait) {
...........
if (psubstream != NULL) {
struct snd_pcm_runtime *runtime = psubstream->runtime;
poll_wait(file, &runtime->sleep, wait);
snd_pcm_stream_lock_irq(psubstream);
if (runtime->status->state != SNDRV_PCM_STATE_DRAINING &&
(runtime->status->state != SNDRV_PCM_STATE_RUNNING ||
snd_pcm_oss_playback_ready(psubstream)))
mask |= EPOLLOUT | EPOLLWRNORM;
snd_pcm_stream_unlock_irq(psubstream);
}
if (csubstream != NULL) {
struct snd_pcm_runtime *runtime = csubstream->runtime;
snd_pcm_state_t ostate;
poll_wait(file, &runtime->sleep, wait);
snd_pcm_stream_lock_irq(csubstream);
..........
}
I don't know if there are any other drivers that use the same way , can add some judgment in io_poll_double_wake()?
>#syz test: git://git.kernel.dk/linux-block syzbot-test
>
>--
>Jens Axboe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists