linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] mm: use PF_ONLY_HEAD for PG_active and PG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210301115007.mgw5vthgjoibnjf4@box>
Date:   Mon, 1 Mar 2021 14:50:07 +0300
From:   "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...temov.name>
To:     Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc:     Yu Zhao <yuzhao@...gle.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        alex.shi@...ux.alibaba.com, vbabka@...e.cz, guro@...com,
        hannes@...xchg.org, hughd@...gle.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, mhocko@...nel.org, vdavydov.dev@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] mm: use PF_ONLY_HEAD for PG_active and
 PG_unevictable

On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 12:13:14PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 02:17:18AM -0700, Yu Zhao wrote:
> > All places but one test, set or clear PG_active and PG_unevictable on
> > small or head pages. Use compound_head() explicitly for that singleton
> > so the rest can rid of redundant compound_head().
> 
> How do you know it's only one place?  I really wish you'd work with me
> on folios.  They make the compiler prove that it's not a tail page.

+1 to this.

The problem with compound_head() is systemic and ad-hoc solution to few
page flags will only complicate the picture.

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov