linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -next] fs: libfs: fix kernel-doc for mnt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210301115439.2edodjidbi6kes2j@wittgenstein>
Date:   Mon, 1 Mar 2021 12:54:39 +0100
From:   Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>
To:     Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Cc:     Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        "David P . Quigley" <dpquigl@...ho.nsa.gov>,
        James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] fs: libfs: fix kernel-doc for mnt_userns

On Tue, Feb 16, 2021 at 09:48:25AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2021 at 08:29:27PM -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > Fix kernel-doc warning in libfs.c.
> > 
> > ../fs/libfs.c:498: warning: Function parameter or member 'mnt_userns' not described in 'simple_setattr'
> 
> Shouldn't the subject say simple_setattr instead of mnt_userns?
> 
> Otherwise looks good:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>

So I've picked this up but just as an fyi b4 fell all over its face on
this series always giving me partial patches or prefixing it with v2 or
v3 or sm. Really strange, I'll report this to Konstantin.

Christian