[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <s5h1rczj8x6.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2021 14:33:09 +0100
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
To: Anton Yakovlev <anton.yakovlev@...nsynergy.com>
Cc: <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
<alsa-devel@...a-project.org>, <virtio-dev@...ts.oasis-open.org>,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 6/9] ALSA: virtio: PCM substream operators
On Mon, 01 Mar 2021 10:29:24 +0100,
Anton Yakovlev wrote:
>
> On 28.02.2021 12:32, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > On Sat, 27 Feb 2021 09:59:53 +0100,
> > Anton Yakovlev wrote:
> >>
>
>
> [snip]
>
>
> >> +static snd_pcm_uframes_t
> >> +virtsnd_pcm_pointer(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream)
> >> +{
> >> + struct virtio_pcm_substream *vss = snd_pcm_substream_chip(substream);
> >> + snd_pcm_uframes_t hw_ptr = SNDRV_PCM_POS_XRUN;
> >> + unsigned long flags;
> >> +
> >> + spin_lock_irqsave(&vss->lock, flags);
> >> + if (!vss->xfer_xrun)
> >> + hw_ptr = bytes_to_frames(substream->runtime, vss->hw_ptr);
> >> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&vss->lock, flags);
> >
> > Oh, and if we drop nonatomc PCM, both trigger and pointer callbacks
> > are guaranteed to be called inside the spinlock, hence you can remove
> > *_irqsave() but just us spin_lock() in those two callbacks.
>
> As I understand, spin_lock_irqsave() disables only local interrupts. But
> what about other CPU cores?
Those are already under spin_lock_irqsave() of the PCM substream
lock (in the case of normal PCM operation without nonatomic flag).
Takashi
Powered by blists - more mailing lists